Best posts made by Olo

@kondo E-hentai hosts pirated content.

@jitensha I bet you bite, too.

@smolchlo Sturgeon’s law: “90% of everything is crap.”

No size kinkster likes everything that falls under “size fantasy,” and because most of it is anonymous smut, there’s no attempt at quality control or holding people to aesthetic standards. The prevailing attitude is: “Thanks for your contribution! We’re just glad you’re here.”

You’re gonna see a lot of stuff that does nothing for you, and some stuff that actively repels you. More heart-breakingly, you will see stuff that is right up your alley but is so poorly done that you will hate yourself for the pity-upvote you give it.

My only advice is patience.

@littlemejeanine I love when tinies get taunted.

@nikkiboi2 Everyone deserves to see themselves in size fantasy, and that means greater diversity in body shapes, skin tones, and facial types. This goes for giants, too.

Also, the squishy tinies last longer.

Aphrodisiac by Mikester65

Merge Together by ModeSeven

@ivythefairie

You know the old adage: you never really get to know a person until they’ve been shrunken small enough to hold in your hand. I am therefore more interested in seeing a variety of different women dwindle out of their clothes and come to grips with having to navigate a world of giants. Young or old, skinny or fat, timid or tough; it’s a new discovery each time.

As to specific sizes, I answered this before.

Nevertheless, if you paraded a wide cross-section of women in front of me and said, “Pick one and we’ll shrink her for you,” I’d probably lean toward a MILF type, old enough to have acquired some confidence and dignity, only to lose it as she became my pet. I would also be strongly tempted by a thick ass and thighs that I could gnaw on.

I didn’t get to see Ivy’s post before she deleted it, but extrapolating from the replies, whenever I “see” myself in a size fantasy, I appear much like I do in real life, which is a spitting image of Jason Momoa.

REQUEST 28 by Lord Xarnor

@littlest-lily Be warned: The Boys is notorious for graphic violence and explicit sex, and judging from the trailer we can expect the same from Gen V.

@ivythefairie There is clearly an appeal to being able to get what you want just by grunting.

@smolchlo Nothing better than a bottle POV looking up at a smug smirk just before the stopper goes in.

@shardro Marvelous!

@Mrgoblinging7 I have complicated thoughts and feelings about this. My formative years occurred before the Internet, so I thought I was the only size perv on the planet. Mainstream size content was all I had. I developed a keen sense for determining what sort of TV shows, movies, books, and comics might feature size content, and how likely such content might contain risqué hints. The best you could realistically hope for was a lingering handheld, a little unaware contact, or some lewd innuendo. Since no one acknowledged size as a fetish, any such scenario would most likely occur in a humorous or horrific context. Cartoons in adult magazines were the best bet, but even there it was very slim pickings.

The other aspect of being reliant on mainstream size content was knowing that if a given TV show or comic series ever did feature a size scenario, it would almost certainly be the last time it did, because the normies would become bored if the show kept returning to the size well. This made those rare size episodes even more fraught, as I knew this was the only chance I might ever get to see, say, a tiny Mork in the same frame with a normal-sized Mindy or a shrunken Diana Rigg crawling about on a giant desktop. Children’s shows were more frequent in their use of size themes because they didn’t expect their audiences either to remember the last time or to care if they repeated themselves, but they were also much less likely to even hint at sizey sexytimes.

In recent decades, however, the Internet has revealed us size pervs to each other and, so-very-slightly, to popular culture. There’s also simply more entertainment content out there (including previously-inaccessible foreign sources), and size content has increased commensurately. There are therefore many more opportunities to encounter mainstream size content, and just as many opportunities for it to be more embarrassing than arousing.

Perhaps because I “imprinted” on mainstream size content, I am still often satisfied when a size encounter keeps the sexual possibilities as subtext. As the volume of size content grows and special effects become cheaper, there will always be opportunities for lascivious leering, indecent proposals, and inappropriate handling. It’s a fine line for mainstream content producers to walk, and I share the Goblin King’s worry that explicit sizey sexytimes can come across as mockery.

The Boys surprised me with Termite. They retconned his character to include a throwaway sight gag from the first season opener, and I was certain that the big splash he made in the third season opener would be the last we would see of him. That they brought him back for “Herogasm” made me worry that either a) mainstream fans would (justly) complain that the show was running out of ideas or b) they were making fun of size pervs. Fortunately, his appearance was just decorative and didn’t derail the plot.

This was also a worry with Downsizing. An R-rated movie from a director with a history of shooting comical nude scenes had the potential to be either miraculous or catastrophic in its presentation of size sexytimes. An early draft of the screenplay had a brief sex scene between different-size characters, mostly off-screen but leaving no doubt about what was happening. I suppose we should be grateful that the finished film ignored the possibilities of giant-tiny sex altogether.