For better or worse, there is no single “size community” and there probably never will be. In the extremely unlikely event that size fantasy ever “goes mainstream,” it will almost certainly focus on a subset of size, leaving the rest of us to complain that we’re not being represented. With the exception of the F/m gatekeeping assholes, I think everyone has a legitimate grievance that their preferences have been ignored or ostracized.
Back when I was on Tumblr, I would frequently see a SFW/fluffy post that I liked and I would reblog it to my blog, which was otherwise filled with graphic size porn. I didn’t quite appreciate at the time that NFSW people who followed my blog would take that as an invitation to start harassing the SFW content creator, demanding that they post or roleplay in an NFSW context. When I realized that I stopped reblogging the fluffy posts, but even when I simply “liked” a SFW post the OP would block me. They had valid reasons for trying to avoid contact with NFSW size fans, but they would also shame them, declaring their SFW preferences to be “pure.” I have heard multiple accounts of similar interactions with SFW size fans, and I think @subasubaski’s concerns are valid.
I think it’s important to remember that when @Jitensha created both SizeCon and this forum, she didn’t want anyone to be excluded (this forum’s prohibition is on F/m content, not F/m fans). She made Daddy’s Dollhouse because she felt that NSFW M/f content (particularly non-con, violent, and cock-featuring content) was being disparaged on other SW sites. At the same time, we also welcome SFW/fluff here, and no one should feel required to engage with or be exposed to NFSW content they don’t want. That’s why we have tags (which should always be used).
