Best posts made by Olo

@maladaptivetiny

Oral Sex by Chiara Ghigliazza

@blehb Ahem.

@maladaptivetiny I just heard someone refer to the age of dating apps as “the Swiping Era,” and I gotta say that hits differently for Size fans.

(source needed)

@BiggnAnSmol said:

@Olo out of curiosity, what SW content would be your taste? Ie, what would your ideal SW content entail?

I appreciate many kinds of SW content, but these days I want to see men overwhelming tiny women not only with their size but also with their attractiveness. I suppose my ideal SW image would be from almost her POV, just behind a bit so we can see her, well, behind. Most of the frame would be taken up by the big boy who likes what he sees. Also good: her watching from the floor/ground as he lumbers by; seeing her POV as she explores his recumbent body.

@blehb said in Go-to sizey daydream?:

Here’s a weirder one I’m wondering if any of you can relate to: I love imagining peoples reactions to size content. Good or bad, I’m just fascinated by people’s thoughts on it (beyond the “wow how strange!” part). Like how into it would they be? What role would they want to play? How would they feel towards someone who was really into it?

And I don’t mean this in a way where I’m trying to project my own fantasies onto them, or hope they’re going to love it as much as I do. It is just a genuine fascination. I don’t have the guts to bring it up to anyone though.

I am probably more interested in normies’ reactions to size content than I am in kinksters’ reactions, tbh. I’m no longer trying to “recruit” people into size fantasy, but I do think it doesn’t have to be as insular as some might think. The aesthetic I’m aiming for in my stories is an engaging story that “just happens” to have size content.

Accordingly, I want to know how much size content normies will entertain before it gets too silly and they stop engaging with it. For example, if I come up with a mixed-size society and describe certain accommodations that are made for People of Unusual Size, my goal is to make the normie reader say, “That’s clever, that’s probably how it would have to work” rather than just laughing at the sight gag.

Once they buy into the premise, then the size smut should sell itself.

Lisztomania

@Afreakingbby There’s nothing wrong with enjoying non-consensual encounters in RPs, stories, and fantasies. There’s even a tag for it: CNC (“consensual non-consent”). As everyone else has said, the key is clear communication beforehand.

@miss-lillipants This reminds me of one of my favorite tropes. Sometimes a giant has a SW totally enclosed in one of his hands, and for whatever reason he doesn’t want to release or reveal her. This happens often enough that they develop a kind of semaphore, where he communicates through combinations of gentle squeezes on certain areas of her body and she responds with pre-arranged sequences of contortions.

This can occur in other areas of the giant’s body, but he can only really effectively reply through his hand and fingers.

Where ya taking all those school girls? by Jessica Rae

F/m has been my primary interest for most of my fetish “career.” Over the years I have observed with increasing dismay and disgust how petty and entitled the loudest segment of F/m enthusiasts became, arrogating to themselves ownership of “the Giantess fetish” and demanding everyone in Size spaces recognize their authority and conform to their prescriptions. There’s nothing about F/m that requires such obnoxious behavior and it’s embarrassing to be associated with it.

The chief problem with “objectification” (in any context) is that it removes other people, erasing their personalities and needs and wants, and treating them as mere props in one’s own narrative. A male F/m fan who has a simplistic and rigid view of how giantesses are supposed to behave is indeed engaging in objectification of women in his fantasy. The remedy is to compose a fantasy featuring complex and varied characters, both male and female, such that everyone has different reactions to the scenario and more readers/viewers can find room for themselves or at least for their desires.

A physical fetish like Size is naturally going to “objectify” elements such as body parts, sensations, and emotional effects. There’s nothing wrong with that. F/m should focus on giant female bodies just as much as M/f should focus on giant male bodies. That’s what we’re here for. As a straight dude who enjoys M/f, I want to see/read how tiny women feel in the presence of giant men. That’s objectification I actively desire.

I completely sympathize with anyone tired of how hegemonic F/m has become in Size spaces. You have nothing to apologize for when venting your feelings on this subject.

@SmolChlo

“Excuse me, are we on a coffee break?”

“I can’t lift a coffee mug.”

“Then I guess the break is over. Back to work, thanks.”

by Unknown Hand

@kisupure said in Gift of a Tiny Woman:

The GTS community definitely still has a lot of baggage to unpack wrt their internalized misandry, though.

A entire separate forum could be devoted to this and similar inquiries, if the willingness and industry existed to sustain them.

For one thing, I don’t think everyone comes to size fantasy by the same path, so how many “misandrist” sentiments are actually compensations for or deflections from other pathologies is anybody’s guess, let alone those engaged in long-game gaslighting.