Posts made by Olo

@foreverlurk said:

May 26th, the day before:
https://www.deviantart.com/colliaz/art/Date-Lukas-wake-up-1056379320

Okay, I had that one. Thanks.

@skysayl said:

tiny men just turn me off. Mood killer it is.

The life a size perv is lived through squinting.

Lara Croft Pinup by @CaddyIsRaddy

@littlest-lily Her Daz3D gallery is still up, including sizey images.

I promise you that these companies don’t spend any time at all on serious evaluations of these issues. The algorithm flags them for deactivation and you have to appeal it to get a human to look at them. Starting since last year, DA account holders have been told that any depiction of size differential is “ambiguous with regard to issues of consent.”

@foreverlurk said:

@foreverlurk Which was her most recent work posted on DA?

I have this one in my favourites, dated may 27th - I think it’s her most recent?

https://www.deviantart.com/colliaz/art/Date-Early-morning-thoughts-1056620239

That’s recent enough that I hadn’t seen it. What’s before that?

@blehb I don’t typically dwell on the fact, but I suppose that my fondness for M/f vore (or at least the threat of it) is, if not exactly obscure, then at least widely deprecated. I still get occasional pushback about male preds and female prey.

I’ve already said before that if you want size content that appreciates giant male bodies (and giant male asses in particular) you have to look at M/m stuff. I think it’s a pity they aren’t more focused on in M/f content.

@foreverlurk Thanks, I’ll check that against my archives when I get home.

BTW, it’s been over five years since Tumblr “deleted” my size blog, but all the images are still accessible if you have their precise URLs. This makes me wonder if Colliaz wasn’t, in fact, a victim of DA’s notorious practice of deleting size kink accounts without warning.

@foreverlurk Which was her most recent work posted on DA?

Mouse Pet by @CaddyIsRaddy

@SmolChlo She’s actually taunting him with her ass.

@Epic-Illusionist Sightlines are so important in Size imagery. Thousands of images have been ruined for me because one or more of the subjects is looking at the viewer instead of at the Biggo/tiny in front of them.

@BigCuddlyGiant

Sex In The City by @CaddyIsRaddy

@The-Big-G said:

Onto the whole minority thing separate tangent but do any others who do art or write stories feel uncomfortable about adding minorities to the shrink fiction.

This issue comes up frequently both in general fiction as well as in smut. In general fiction the main concern is avoiding stereotypes and unintentional racism (often due to ignorance of historical or social context). In smut there is the additional hazard of fetishization of race (even while we’re fetishizing size). Finally, not everyone agrees on racial categories and terminology, so it is perilous to assume your readers share your perspective.

On the other hand, readers like descriptions, particularly when it comes to characters they’re going to be spending a lot of time with. In longer works, a character’s racial/ethnic background may factor in the theme or plot, which requires a complex awareness of multiple perspectives lest the readers spot the author’s ignorance or prejudice. In stroke fiction, of course, physical details are the meat (heh) of the action.

A common mistake is to avoid using any racial/ethnic identifiers at all. The pitfall here is that you run the risk of all your characters being presumed to be white, straight, cis, able, skinny, neurotypical, etc. If you only give physical descriptions to POC or LGBTQ+ or disabled characters, you’re perpetuating the Marked/Unmarked problem. In my earlier work, I have tried to thread this needle by being scanty with physical descriptions but using “ethnically-pronounced” character names to smuggle in ethnic identities. I now regret this practice.

Another concern that requires sensitivity is the issue of representation. Everyone deserves to see themselves in art and literature, and that includes size smut. If they can do it on Bridgerton, we can do it in Size Fantasy. Of course, in visual arts you can easily include all sorts of different-looking people without making it look like diversity for diversity’s sake. In text it’s a little more pronounced, especially if you’re only mentioning physical details for characters in Marked categories.

Finally, one of the chief uses for written smut is letting the reader project themselves upon or at least strongly sympathize with one or more characters. Making the characters “too” specific might create an obstacle for readers who are distracted or disappointed by a certain detail. “I was really into this story until I read that the giant had a goatee. I hate those.” Fortunately, size pervs have a lot of practice with mentally editing smut so it accommodates their preferences.

There’s no easy answer to this except to be attentive and careful and to read stories from a wide range of sources. If you want to write about a character with an unfamiliar background, try to find a test-reader who has that background to help you avoid glaring errors (if you don’t know anyone with that background, reconsider giving it to your character).

Am I wrong to feel this way about desiring vanilla,chocolate and or caramel when it comes to my tiny ladies

One easy tip: Avoid food metaphors for people or the color of their skin (even when you’re writing vore).

@Epic-Illusionist Concentration by Chanel