@olo dirty birds, watching that in the middle of their office.
I mean I’d be recording it on my camera but “only so the news can buy my video”, I’d explain.
Best posts made by tiny-ivy
-
RE: We Thought It Was An Earthquake
-
RE: Description of a non con Vore
@giant-keith This is really hot! Keep up the good work, you have a great imagination.
-
RE: Face-up or Face-down?
@olo my preferences don’t matter as much as how I got there.
If it starts with a shrunken me staring at them in terror, from below, I’d probably wind up staring at his horrible face. Watching him expressing pleasure from using me like a toy.
If it’s starting with us having consensual sex, and I shrink as the act continues, I’ll probably end up facing away from him, since most of my favorite positions are in that direction. His dick getting strangely bigger than normal, until I notice that his hands are now basically wrapping around me and carrying my weight up and down. -
RE: G/t male giant trend among male models
@green ??? Why male models what? I don’t get your question. I answered why I noticed this trend there. Are you asking why I follow male models? Because I’m attracted to men? Is that confusing to you?
-
RE: Micro-Manager
@mrgoblinging7 I like the characterization and the build up very much. The action was hot, too. Thank you for adding this!
-
RE: My Future Render Ideas + Tell Me Yours!
@giantesslover45 I love all three. It’s hard to pick! I am leaning towards the professor one.
As for other ideas, as much as I love giant dicks and cum, a less-often-seen type of render is one focusing more on hands. I love the idea of a render that focuses on an earlier part of the encounter: the moment a shrunken woman’s plucked from the ground, the giant man’s fingers positioned over her back and her chest, or squeezing her across her shoulders, her feet just barely in the air. She hasn’t even processed what this means yet and is still startled or in shock. She could still survive a fall from this height… But it’s just the beginning.
-
RE: G/t male giant trend among male models
@miss-lillipants Thanks for the clarification! I love that movie, but I’m not the best with specific quotes. I would recognize a facial quote of Blue Steel more than any written line.
-
RE: Attorney At Large [M/sw, gentle giant, light kink]
@kisupure I finally had time to come back to this today. And I’m so happy I got to. This is a real gem.
-
RE: What does your giant look like?
@olo
Ideal size is whatever it takes for me to be, to him, 2-6 inches tall.For romantic scenarios, I do prefer the giant to be attractive in the way I’m attracted to normal-sized men. A body that looks either sculpted or just in shape, and a classically handsome face. A charming demeanor works for attraction too - a sweet enough smile means the face doesn’t have to look like a greek statue when still.
Fashion seems sort of irrelevant to me in this kink. IRL I enjoy a man with any well thought out style, regardless of his genre of fashion, if he sticks to it, I appreciate the effort. If I could pick absolutely anything, I have a total fetish for 19th and 18th century menswear, but that’s a rare interest for men, so I don’t even dare imagine it.
I also get sorta imprinted on by men in movies and TV who seem like hot giants.
Jon Hamm plays a domme to a digital tiny woman in a holiday episode of Black Mirror. That’s stuck with me. The pure monstrous psychopathy of Javier Bardem in No Country For Old Men also hit me at an impressionable college age. That character would dispassionately eat boxes full of tiny women if he felt like it.Purely evil giants, in non-romantic scenarios, can also be hot when they’re definitely not typically attractive. Fat and insatiable, balding, unkempt. Bad style. Normally timid.
As long as they don’t seem somehow sick / frail, any other type of typically unappealing man can be fun to be cruelly destroyed by. (I never thought about it until now but yeah, much older ages and infirmness or weakness is somehow a big nope point for me. And ages where it’s unclear at a glance if they’re over 18, of course, but I feel like that kind of goes without saying.)
-
RE: The Transitive Property of Queerness
@Olo
I didn’t have space to put this in the post because of character limits. But the shrinking virus that acts this way, where it suddenly shrinks anybody who’s gay, came from an author named darkMind on coiled fist. He gave me permission to use it.I always need explanations for things, and even in his stories the virus seems to randomly shrink gay men instead of being spread through sex or coughing. It’s based on random chance and same sex attraction. I love how unexpected the shrinking is in his scenarios.
I personally think it’s acting more like a slow-spreading curse than like a virus, based on that. I think the virus is the news media’s explanation of a mysterious phenom.
Meghan/Zack’s attraction to Sasha/Gabriel is what shrunk them both. It doesn’t really matter what they call their genders, there’s something queer going on there, even if it was “just” a trans man / straight woman attraction, it’s all too confusing and atypical for the virus’s taste, and down they both go.
-
RE: Witness Your God
@olo oh my, this is a fun start. You could show them your religion’s version of taking communion at the very end. Or at least threaten it.
Great… Now my brain’s already running away down a path. I’m picturing a Satanic sorcerer, who’s read Lavey, who has rituals with phrases about being our own gods. What’s the fun with being your own god if you don’t have mortals to grovel at your feet, though?
-
RE: Being A Slave To Rome
@mrgoblinging7 I love how bisexual this artist’s images seem. Love an objectified man and objectified woman in the same image.
-
RE: The Transitive Property of Queerness
@Olo oh yeah, it certainly could have gone that way. Maybe he’d do that in a more private setting than a big frat party.
In this world, Sean will have more opportunities for that later. Maybe an encounter with a flirtatious bi woman who hopes that lots of sex with men will make her immune.
-
RE: Sex Objects
I find that in my enjoyment of size content, the quality and skill of the work matter more to me than whether or not the male porny gaze is obvious. And it is obvious, of course, but that’s fine. If it’s well done, it’s still hot.
Someone else said, their first audience when they write is themselves. I am the same. I have various hobbies, size writing being just one of them, and there are periods (like right now) when I’m not actively working on my macro writing. When I get back to it, I feel drawn by like this call that, “more hot stories about M/f giants have to be written - it’s still so underserved!”
In my M/f stories, I am writing for the sake of the people who see themselves as tiny women first, because that is usually the way I relate to these scenes, and, because I love encouraging tiny women to get more into it. I am glad that straight men enjoy my content as well, it’s always nice to have one’s work appreciated.
There have to be more women out there with this kink, who would be the ones who write less male-gazey-erotica, but I think a lot of them get instead drawn to the realistic-giant size range that’s well served by popular erotic fiction about werewolves and sasquatches, and call themselves monster fuckers, instead. If you’ve ever asked “Where are the women macrophiles”, my theory is, that’s where.