If you actually had the be ability to shrink someone or get shrink would you?
-
@giant-me I prefer the Old Dc/Marvel comics as well.
-
@hentaihunter1 Superman, Spiderman, and Batman is what I read most as a kid.
-
@giant-me I was more X-Men and Hulk in Marvel.
DC I preferred the C-level heroes. JSA and their connected heroes. I did like Wally-Flash, but mostly because they used Jay-Flash a lot when I was reading them. That and I have a real fondness for Flash’s Rouges over the other DC villains.
-
@hentaihunter1 I really enjoyed the flash not my most favorite hero, but the CW show, and the Justice League Synder cut, and the upcoming movie made me like him more.
-
@hentaihunter1 Yeah, no doubt power would corrupt people. The ability to shrink anyone would be really hard power to pass up.
-
@thumbloverver2 Most people in the comics with shrink powers were supervillains then you had heroes like the Atom/Ray Palmer, the wasp and Antman/Hank Pym who’d use the powers to do good.
-
About the time I answered my own question I suppose. I would definitely shrink someone but I want it to be reversible as well. I believe an experience so intimate has to be agreed upon and that is the only way it would be enjoyable. I also wouldn’t want to harm them since I would feel bad. Even though, I can be quite a petty person wouldn’t mind shrinking someone who has wronged me. lol. But I would rather not have the ability since I would definitely go crazy with the power. To be honest. Though I will never be 100% sure since shrinking is scientifically impossible. lol.
-
@thumbloverver2 Reversible is an important thing, where’s the antidote, growth ray to undo this if I accidently shrink myself, or the wrong person, or decide the real thing isn’t as fun as the fantasy, yeah shrinking is impossible in the real world, but we can dream together.
-
@thumbloverver2 Not to encourage any would be supervillains but history is filled with surpassed Scientific Impossible. It was once thought breaking the sound barrier was one after all. Mind you, I don’t think shrink tech is on the way. I’m just that a its Scientific Impossible currently type of guy.
HH1
-
@hentaihunter1 It’s highly improbable according to a video I watched we would need an energy source similar to the sun in order to to make it work. Of course, I might be wrong. If I were to ever become a villain I would be as threatening as Doofenshmirtz. lol
-
@thumbloverver2 Phineas and Ferb
-
@giant-me I see you are a man of culture as well.
-
@thumbloverver2 Yeah, depends on the theory of how. There is also the mass. Compress the space between Electrons and a 10kg item shrunk is still a 10 kg item. Remove the mass, and it has to go somewhere.
Now here is how I was able too, oh, right. Ahh, yeah, currently unlikely technology. Still Sci-Fi stuff.
HH1
Oops, almost gave away my scheme of Tri-State conquest!!! -
@hentaihunter1 Yeah, doing a science talk, you would have to store or trade mass with another object or being or space, create the right amount of energy for the spatial displacement field (It is a term related to physics. - It is the shortest path covered by an object. - Its SI unit is m. - Displacement can be zero, if the initial point and the final point of the object are same. - It is a vector quantity, ie, it has both magnitude and direction. Space time has a lot to do with mass, gravity etc.)
, still having a viable living subject as a result, a living, breathing, consuming, moving, thinking, viable subject at the end. -
This is my theory for reducing mass in an object/subject. I hope you find this at least entertaining. Reducing mass involves displacement of it trading or storing the mass you want to change, this is the way the atoms must be changed, it involves space, time, and placed energy at a volume and speed. Like the possibilities of time travel or teleportation a fixed point of both objects or space the object or objects occupy must be calculated as well as both objects’ mass and degree of it you desire to change which takes a lot of energy to achieve like possibly solar, nuclear power or cold fusion of a high magnitude. In short you are teleporting the mass of an object to another space or another object, the act of splitting and displacing atoms. The most important factor is the rate of temperature of applied energy too much or too little can damage the object or subject causing non-viability for it to possibly implode, explode, or disintegrate. Like I mentioned earlier a spatial displacement field must be achieved to alter an object or subject, this is the main theory of changing/altering matter by calculating and then altering the space it occupies. For a living subject’s properties must be altered by strength or acceptance to keep them alive, factors like breathing thicker air/strengthening the subject’s lungs, ingesting/consuming denser water and food/strengthening the subject’s digestive system, and also strengthening their skin and bones to make it more durable for the larger environment, giving them a mouse or rat’s or even an insect’s viability. One final important factor to have is the stability of the subjects’ new state of existence, staying intact over time, applying constant viability to its new size. In physics or the physical world all requirements must be met to make anything possible, yes today’s science fiction is tomorrow’s science fact, once all factors are met to make the impossible, possible.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login