@giant_feelings Toss that cherry and dunk her in the frosting face-down. Look at those flailing legs!

Best posts made by Olo
-
RE: Good appetite
-
RE: Go-to sizey daydream?
@maladaptivetiny More like straight-up abduction, but the spirit is the same.
-
RE: zHEIGHTgeist
@SmolChlo So far, Aborigen has (unintentionally) devoted more time to the experiences and desires of macrophiles than those of microphiles. I don’t think that’s wholly unreasonable, given that I believe there are more macrophiles than microphiles in the size community, but I hope he rectifies this with the sensory impressions that microphiles find attractive. Being someone else’s entire world, affirming their total dependence on you, taking pride in providing for their needs; that’s what Biggos crave. Precious fragility and uncontested possession; gimme gimme gimme.
@blehb said:
While I definitely think that feeling of connection and safety plays a huge role in my fantasy, I think there may be a touch of masochism there as well.
Oh, there are many, many dimensions to these desires. I once discussed Unaware fantasies with someone who prefers them (I don’t, really), and ultimately I offered the following interpretation: One attraction of being tiny in an unaware scenario is experiencing peril or abuse from someone who doesn’t intend it, so you can’t blame them or think ill of them afterward.
-
RE: Watching Others Watch Size
@littlest-lily THIS. Horror in unquestionably one of most normie-accessible modes for introducing size content, and that’s almost certainly why I keep returning to it. (The other mode, of course, is comedy, which is why I expected Downsizing to get into some explicit sexytimes.)
-
RE: We'll Have Fun Together
@smolchlo I haven’t seen a waterbed in years, but that would be the perfect Bouncy House for tiny ladies, particularly when I flopped onto it.
-
RE: zHEIGHTgeist
Episode 005 just dropped. Mouthplay and vore are discussed.
-
RE: Watching Others Watch Size
@littlest-lily said:
I feel like it takes a bit away from the sex appeal for me? I’d just love to see a scenario where the size difference is meant to be taken seriously.
I feel exactly the same. Given our society’s immaturity regarding sex, I don’t expect any mixed-size relationship to portrayed completely without humor, but I would like the participants not to be depicted as crazy or wholly in thrall to a weird fetish (or the tiny as an unwilling captive of a priapic giant). I genuinely think the appeal isn’t that difficult to appreciate.
-
RE: zHEIGHTgeist
@giantmaneddie I still don’t know if it will get addressed in the podcast, but Aborigen did some comparing and contrasting of recent mainstream “What is Macrophilia?” articles on his Substack.
-
RE: Watching Others Watch Size
@blehb said:
BUT the fact that both “normies” and the size community were craving more of that content is kind of promising no? And I feel over the past few years people online have been a lot more forward regarding “unusual” attractions they have. The internet lost its mind with Lady Dimitrescu.
Absolutely. Deviance is becoming normalized. It’s been a long time since I’ve been single, but it does seem everyone has at least one weird little fetish and not being able to admit to some kink would raise eyebrows. Considering what’s out there and what people are willing to admit, size kinks are cute and relatively harmless.
-
RE: Trying New Things
@smolchlo I think there’s room for you at the far end of my fleshlight (for now).
-
Size Tier List(s)
My introduction to tier lists was a (rather basic) Size-themed list a couple of years ago on SizeTwitter. Today I came across a much more detailed one, but I quickly realized that all the options were exclusively F/m.
I’m afraid I have no choice but to compile my own set of options from scratch.
Please send me any and all options that you want to see included so that I might ensure everyone is represented. If you have illustrations that you think I could use (remember they’re going to be very small), please include them (including their sources).