Nothing’s easier to snatch than a tiny lady looking at her phone. You can even bring your open mouth down over them like a T-Rex and they won’t even notice until it’s too late. One second they’re swiping the 'Gram, the next they’re staring at your gullet. 
Best posts made by Olo
-
Immersedposted in Size Fantasy Chat
-
RE: I wish there was a term for exclusively male giantsposted in Size Life Chat
Trying to keep and modify “giant” seems futile. In English the suffix “-ess” is how a generic noun is “marked” as female. It’s a deliberately sexist construction, assuming the default person is male.
I think we’d be better off using another synonym altogether or even inventing entirely new words.
-
RE: I hate my job...posted in Stories
Replying to u/PuddingGremlin_9k
From u/BetweenDesireAndBreakfastI’m so happy for you both! It must be a real tightrope act to make that kind of relationship work. Forgive my curiosity, but how are mixed-size relationships viewed in your country? You and Big Boss can’t have been the first.
-
RE: A Tinies Tasteposted in Size Fantasy Chat
@SmolChlo Bearing in mind that fearplay is an important attraction for many preds and prey, I rarely intend to swallow tiny ladies, and I never want to chew them. I have written at least one hard vore (that is, chewing) scene, but those are all about vengeance or punishment, and it’s never a pleasant-tasting experience for the pred.
When I dream about having a shrunken woman in my mouth, tasting every last bit of her is the primary goal of the experience. Her skin will be salty, and she might have some grooming products on her that add some intriguing notes. Not everything will be rosewater; I’m going to clean her dirty soles and her funky asshole. But the true revelations will come as she gets excited, whether from fear or arousal. I consider it a point of pride when one of my mouth-toys loses control of her bladder.
Welcome to my palate.
-
RE: I wish there was a term for exclusively male giantsposted in Size Life Chat
@foreverlurk I went looking for an online German translation of Gulliver’s Travels and I found this. Who knows what we’ll get this time?
-
RE: I hate my job...posted in Stories
From u/BetweenDesireAndBreakfast
Sounds typical. In my country, mixed-size marriages are illegal, and just hooking up with the wrong size is frequently met with violence. A close friend from high school stopped talking to me after he found out I had a mixed relationship. I’m seriously thinking about emigrating as soon as I get my degree.
-
RE: A Tinies Tasteposted in Size Fantasy Chat
@SmolChlo For some non-painful, non-fatal swallowing, try The Circle of Lust.
-
RE: Her Daily Jobposted in Artwork
@comicmaster1997 Nothing wrong at all. This is a place for tinies who can take it.
-
RE: I wish there was a term for exclusively male giantsposted in Size Life Chat
@foreverlurk said:
I much prefer “lilliputienne”.
German doesn’t seem to like double consonants like those in “Lilliput.” Their words for male and female inhabitants of Lilliput are Liliputaner and Lililputanerin.
I bought the first hard copy of Milo Manara’s Gulliveriana I came across, which was in France. When Gulliveriana finally has her big disagreement with the Empress of Lilliput, she calls the latter a “Lilliputasse.”
-
RE: All That I Could Seeposted in Stories
Downright adorable is what it is.
Stop stealing my comments!
I remain envious of your industry. Do you plan to keep this one just from Cameron’s POV?
-
Oh, I'm gonna grab yaposted in Size Fantasy Chat
But first, I’m gonna make you watch me roll up my sleeves.
-
RE: Does anyone feel this way about F/mposted in Size Life Chat
F/m has been my primary interest for most of my fetish “career.” Over the years I have observed with increasing dismay and disgust how petty and entitled the loudest segment of F/m enthusiasts became, arrogating to themselves ownership of “the Giantess fetish” and demanding everyone in Size spaces recognize their authority and conform to their prescriptions. There’s nothing about F/m that requires such obnoxious behavior and it’s embarrassing to be associated with it.
The chief problem with “objectification” (in any context) is that it removes other people, erasing their personalities and needs and wants, and treating them as mere props in one’s own narrative. A male F/m fan who has a simplistic and rigid view of how giantesses are supposed to behave is indeed engaging in objectification of women in his fantasy. The remedy is to compose a fantasy featuring complex and varied characters, both male and female, such that everyone has different reactions to the scenario and more readers/viewers can find room for themselves or at least for their desires.
A physical fetish like Size is naturally going to “objectify” elements such as body parts, sensations, and emotional effects. There’s nothing wrong with that. F/m should focus on giant female bodies just as much as M/f should focus on giant male bodies. That’s what we’re here for. As a straight dude who enjoys M/f, I want to see/read how tiny women feel in the presence of giant men. That’s objectification I actively desire.
I completely sympathize with anyone tired of how hegemonic F/m has become in Size spaces. You have nothing to apologize for when venting your feelings on this subject.


