Best posts made by Olo

@hentaihunter1 With two of them, you could make an instructive example of one.

Update: I just discovered that this was by Unknown Hand. For some reason, it took me until today to discover the long, ancient thread collecting his size art on Giantess City. His work is from the 90s and early Aughts, and while it is mostly F/m, there’s some good M/f stuff in there, which I will add to the queue for my daily posts here.

@SmolChlo Has there been any investigation into whether they were roleplaying?

@hentaihunter1 said in Sex Objects:

the first member of my reading audience is me

Same here. I want to see more giant men in my own work as well as in others’.

self-loathing issues

It’s clear to me that self-loathing is at the root of many behaviors involving porn. Imagining myself worshipped by tiny women (who find individual regions of my body attractive) is fundamental to my appreciation of M/f size fantasy.

You don’t have to be sexually attracted to a particular body to want to see it, even in porn. And sometimes, for some of us, unattractive bodies are necessary to make the fantasy work.

@sloppy_amy More like rubbing one out.

@SmolChlo Yeah, that’s not something you spring on someone unless you’re 110% certain beforehand that they’re into it.

Who leaked the DMs, and what did they think Hammer meant?

I wish I had a fleshlight that looked and sounded and smelled and tasted and felt exactly like you.

@btbutcher Seems to me she’s left her outlet wide open.

@Kisupure

@tiny-ivy said in Sex Objects:

There have to be more women out there with this kink, who would be the ones who write less male-gazey-erotica, but I think a lot of them get instead drawn to the realistic-giant size range that’s well served by popular erotic fiction about werewolves and sasquatches, and call themselves monster fuckers, instead.

by Ernie Centofanti (aka Pacific1982)

@foreverlurk “I could just eat you up.”

@tiny-ivy

I’m sure this sentiment comes from a place of cis privilege, but I have never heard of a positive trait attributed to “masculinity” that couldn’t be more honestly attributed to “adulthood.”

There should definitely be distinct physical aesthetics for male bodies; several, in fact. Appreciating male bodies for their forms and functions should not, however, determine anything meaningful about the people living in those bodies. To claim otherwise is to be a gender essentialist, to restrict a person’s potential based on their (singular) sex.

“Toxic masculinity” is really just “limited humanity.”

@kisupure said in Showing Her Her Place:

@olo Don’t forget the bits of string that they can get all tangled up in!

Like this?

@SmolChlo I have a number of effective traps to recommend.