Update: I just discovered that this was by Unknown Hand. For some reason, it took me until today to discover the long, ancient thread collecting his size art on Giantess City. His work is from the 90s and early Aughts, and while it is mostly F/m, there’s some good M/f stuff in there, which I will add to the queue for my daily posts here.
@kisupure It wouldn’t have played well with the corpsmen, but Gray deserved to take Wesson out.
@hentaihunter1 said in Sex Objects:
the first member of my reading audience is me
Same here. I want to see more giant men in my own work as well as in others’.
self-loathing issues
It’s clear to me that self-loathing is at the root of many behaviors involving porn. Imagining myself worshipped by tiny women (who find individual regions of my body attractive) is fundamental to my appreciation of M/f size fantasy.
You don’t have to be sexually attracted to a particular body to want to see it, even in porn. And sometimes, for some of us, unattractive bodies are necessary to make the fantasy work.
@kisupure So, you gonna draw Keith in his boxers?
It’s probably apocryphal, but back in the 90s I heard about female lawyers putting their testosterone levels on their resumes.
I wish I had a fleshlight that looked and sounded and smelled and tasted and felt exactly like you. 
@kisupure Those are some cuddly-looking calves.
@tiny-ivy said in Sex Objects:
There have to be more women out there with this kink, who would be the ones who write less male-gazey-erotica, but I think a lot of them get instead drawn to the realistic-giant size range that’s well served by popular erotic fiction about werewolves and sasquatches, and call themselves monster fuckers, instead.
I’ve recently been catching up on The Americans (first time for me; no spoilers!), and it is such a trip to see a shrunken Keri Russell in Honey, I Blew Up The Kid.
I’m sure this sentiment comes from a place of cis privilege, but I have never heard of a positive trait attributed to “masculinity” that couldn’t be more honestly attributed to “adulthood.”
There should definitely be distinct physical aesthetics for male bodies; several, in fact. Appreciating male bodies for their forms and functions should not, however, determine anything meaningful about the people living in those bodies. To claim otherwise is to be a gender essentialist, to restrict a person’s potential based on their (singular) sex.
“Toxic masculinity” is really just “limited humanity.”
