Best posts made by Olo

@blehb said:

For me it varies depending on my mood.

When it comes to the little ladies, I’m afraid I’m exactly the same. In fact, the chief attraction of keeping a “harem” of SWs is for the variety of personalities. Also, nothing flatters my sense of dominance more than having to resolve disputes between petulant tiny women.

The only personality type that irritates me is utterly submissive and worshipful. Too suspicious. I’d probably regard that as a challenge to find some way to provoke her to protest.

Like Foreverlurk, I really enjoy the journey as a shrunken woman adapts to her new size. Enthusiastic or distraught, I want to see her discover what she really wants and needs, and determine if and how I can provide that. I also want to give her the opportunity to entertain me. They can occasionally come up with the most delightful surprises.

Those that were born tiny (like Borrowers) think they know everything. They also act like I’m the freakish one. I don’t want to break that attitude, but I stay alert for an opportunity to demonstrate that she doesn’t quite know everything.

Even when a SW has finally become acclimated to her size and my presence, I still appreciate it when she retains a modicum of indignation whenever I handle her. I like being reminded that I’m overwhelming.

Hand held SW on the beach by maur47

@foreverlurk I mean, I think I’ve led a rather vanilla sheltered life, but even I’ve heard of oral sex.

Shrunken Woman on hands by maur47

@miss-lillipants You got my nips all perky.

needs source

I could watch this all day.

needs source (looks like @shrunken-ryan too me)

As seen on Blooski

A Little Trouble by QueenZelda

@Nyx Just unbelievable amounts of entitlement.

Deposit by TheTibt

@Jötunn Lotsa girls into cockvore on Bluesky. They’re so eager they won’t let me taste them first; they only have eyes for my pisshole.

needs source

The tension here is between an individual (if influential) woman expressing her sexuality (and, yes, selling her album) as she sees fit and a sexist society that prioritizes the male gaze and normalizes male dominance. There is no easy resolution of this tension; everyone has to weigh individual expression against social obligation every day in every aspect of their lives.

The second wave feminist argument is that Carpenter’s choices not only affect Carpenter but everyone exposed to those choices. Third wave feminists will claim that Carpenter is owning her sexuality, including an expression of submission.

These two poles are much less helpful at the extremes; the Marxist analysis assigns too little agency to individuals, whereas “choice” feminism assigns too much. No one “chooses their choice” in a vacuum, but each of us can transcend our historical and class circumstances to make decisions for ourselves.

The feminist objection to Carpenter’s image is not that it is sexual but that it reinforces a very specific vision of heterosexual relations. Second wavers will argue that Carpenter has an obligation not to celebrate sexual submission because both men and women will necessarily see it as an endorsement of male supremacy. Third wavers will deny that Carpenter has any such obligation.

In my opinion we are each responsible for what we put into the world, regardless of our intentions. Any human expression has the potential to have unintended consequences, but that does not mean that we should stop expressing ourselves.