@littlest-lily Blurry Pepper is best Pepper! Not because she’s ugly or anything. Just because the concept is adorable. 
(Seriously, there’s an untapped “blurry tinies” market.)
@littlest-lily Blurry Pepper is best Pepper! Not because she’s ugly or anything. Just because the concept is adorable. 
(Seriously, there’s an untapped “blurry tinies” market.)
And here’s Part 2.
GIANT GUY: “So my idea is that we dress you up like a sugar plum fairy and then–oh, sorry, I need to speak softly so I don’t deafen you, right?”
TINY GIRL: “Yes, please!”
GIANT GUY: “Feathers. Pillows. Fluffy bunny fur. Clouds. Bouncy Jell-O. Hippies.”
TINY GIRL “----you’re hilarious.”
@foreverlurk Exactly…I believe Google is pure evil. And so are Apple, Meta, Microsoft, OpenAI, etc., because they’re all wannabe dictators whose end goal is to get as much power as possible (by any means possible) and to control everyone forever, appointing themselves as our unelected rulers. If I could avoid giving money to any of them, I would, but it’s pretty much impossible to do that without swearing off computers and phones altogether.
@SmolChlo Wait…you mean you’re NOT actually tiny and typing all of your posts by dancing on a phone/computer keyboard?? I WAS very impressed with your lack of typos, considering your circumstances, but now I retract my accolades! 
@SmolChlo Hehehe, thank you! I don’t know how many times I can use this same format without getting to the point where I just end up repeating myself. I don’t see the purpose of rewriting the same stories I’ve already written before (unless I’m convinced I can do it better than the first time). But as luck would have it, I’m actually working on a new one today. If all goes well, it’ll probably be posted sometime tonight.
Personally, I don’t think the lack of a term for male giants in the size community has anything to do with gender politics. I think it’s just because ninety-nine percent of the size content that features giant people is focused on female giants. It’s because giantess content is MUCH more popular and visible (and prolific) than giant male content. The GTS people have a louder voice, as a group, so it’s much easier for them to coin terms that suit their needs and to have those terms catch on. The SW people can coin their own terms too, of course, but those are much less likely to catch on and become commonly used, because they don’t get tons of use and aren’t being constantly reinforced, except maybe in very small groups.
Also, people who like giantess content tend to pay very little, if any, attention to other size content that isn’t giantess-related. If they don’t intentionally go looking for it (and why would they?), they’re not likely to see it in the first place. For them, it’s as if the rest of the size community doesn’t exist…they live in a bubble. If something doesn’t exist in their world, they’re probably not going to feel compelled to create special nomenclature for it.
It’s the same reason why normies don’t have a word for male giants: because they spend almost zero time thinking about giant people (of either gender). Why would they need special vocabulary for something that simply isn’t on their radar? Even in fiction, giant people are not common. The lack of vocabulary comes from a general lack of caring.
@SmolChlo Plus, if you’re up close and personal with the follicles as a tiny, they’re great for exfoliating and/or acupuncture. 
[returns to brutalizing helpless tiny women with rough facial hair]
@miss-lillipants Speaking as someone who HAS recorded himself doing this stuff, I hate listening to my own voice too. Here’s my secret for success: I never listen to my own recordings.
I just record myself narrating the script, do it all in one take, and then I listen to the first one or two seconds of the recording (just to make sure it recorded correctly) and turn it off as fast as I can. Then I post it online without doing any further “quality control.” To this day, I’ve never listened to one of my own recordings all the way through. Not even once. It’s a very effective tactic! You just have to resist the urge to be a perfectionist about it. (I think that perfectionism is what causes people to listen through their own recordings, looking for flaws and problems.)
@TakoAlice8 On one level, I can relate, because I strongly dislike F/m content (actually, I strongly dislike “tiny male” content in general). It does make me feel uncomfortable and kind of grossed out, but I also realize that there’s nothing inherently wrong with other people liking it…just because I don’t like something doesn’t mean it shouldn’t exist.
I’m not bothered so much by “objectification”, per se, because I believe it’s impossible to be sexually attracted to another person without “objectifying” them in some way. Lots of people act as if only men can objectify others and only women can be objectified, but there’s absolutely zero evidence to support that idea. Both genders do it, and both genders are on the receiving end of it. I don’t think so-called “objectification” is automatically bad or dehumanizing, because it’s possible to see someone as BOTH an object of sexual desire AND as a human being at the same time. Objectification doesn’t become a problem unless you see someone ONLY as a sexual object and not as a person too. The desire to have sex with someone doesn’t imply that you don’t see them as a person.
(Lots of women have asked their husbands in exasperation: “Why do you want to have sex with me when I’m not in the mood? Do you see me as nothing but a sex object?” But a husband could reply to that by saying “Why do you want me to listen to you vent about your problems for three hours when I’m not in the mood? Do you see me as nothing but a listening object?” Or “Why do you want me to pay bills and be a provider when I’m not in the mood? Do you see me as nothing but a financial object?” It’s all a matter of perspective.)
So I don’t worry so much about the objectification component. But it does bother me how the women in F/m content tend to behave in ways that NO actual human would EVER behave. Either they’re nymphomaniacs who think about nothing but sex at all times or they’re psychopathic sadists with an unquenchable lust for blood and the humiliation or degradation of others. That does turn me off and give me “the ick.” I don’t understand why any man would find that attractive in a woman or want to fantasize about it.
@littlest-lily See? Playing video games DOES lead to real-life violence!! If you grew up playing Tetris, you can’t resist the urge to insert snugly-fitting things into other things. It’s all downhill from there… 