Posts made by protect-tinies

@The-Big-G Yes, I have! Example: I was texting this girl romantically, and I engaged in some PG-rated roleplay with her where I shrunk her down and played with her. I didn’t tell her that sizey stuff was a “thing” that people were into online, and I’m sure she had no idea that the size community existed.

Over a week later, after that initial sizey conversation, I jokingly asked her if she was feeling more submissive or more feisty today. (That question made more sense in context.)

Her exact reply was: “Depends on my size. Haha. Willing to shrink me? ”

This time, I wasn’t even the one who brought up the idea of shrinking! She was the one who brought it up! She absolutely loved being tiny in a romantic context. This was not the last time we talked about shrinking scenarios. She got really into it.

I’ve had other “planting seeds” experiences besides this one, and I’ve written about them here:
https://www.tumblr.com/protector-of-tinies/799484673199882240/in-my-dating-life-ive-experimented-with-bringing?source=share
https://www.tumblr.com/protector-of-tinies/796700468252459008/remember-how-ive-said-liking-gt-is-more-normal?source=share
https://www.tumblr.com/protector-of-tinies/796793312757661696/another-gt-texting-conversation-i-had-with-this?source=share

@TakoAlice8 On one level, I can relate, because I strongly dislike F/m content (actually, I strongly dislike “tiny male” content in general). It does make me feel uncomfortable and kind of grossed out, but I also realize that there’s nothing inherently wrong with other people liking it…just because I don’t like something doesn’t mean it shouldn’t exist.

I’m not bothered so much by “objectification”, per se, because I believe it’s impossible to be sexually attracted to another person without “objectifying” them in some way. Lots of people act as if only men can objectify others and only women can be objectified, but there’s absolutely zero evidence to support that idea. Both genders do it, and both genders are on the receiving end of it. I don’t think so-called “objectification” is automatically bad or dehumanizing, because it’s possible to see someone as BOTH an object of sexual desire AND as a human being at the same time. Objectification doesn’t become a problem unless you see someone ONLY as a sexual object and not as a person too. The desire to have sex with someone doesn’t imply that you don’t see them as a person.

(Lots of women have asked their husbands in exasperation: “Why do you want to have sex with me when I’m not in the mood? Do you see me as nothing but a sex object?” But a husband could reply to that by saying “Why do you want me to listen to you vent about your problems for three hours when I’m not in the mood? Do you see me as nothing but a listening object?” Or “Why do you want me to pay bills and be a provider when I’m not in the mood? Do you see me as nothing but a financial object?” It’s all a matter of perspective.)

So I don’t worry so much about the objectification component. But it does bother me how the women in F/m content tend to behave in ways that NO actual human would EVER behave. Either they’re nymphomaniacs who think about nothing but sex at all times or they’re psychopathic sadists with an unquenchable lust for blood and the humiliation or degradation of others. That does turn me off and give me “the ick.” I don’t understand why any man would find that attractive in a woman or want to fantasize about it.

@TakoAlice8 said in Rating mushrooms I sat on recently:

This red mushroom is very beautiful, but the white specks were a bit uncomfortable

If they’re uncomfortable, it just means you’re not small enough. When the white specks are bigger than your entire body, it completely changes the whole experience.

Personally, I don’t think the lack of a term for male giants in the size community has anything to do with gender politics. I think it’s just because ninety-nine percent of the size content that features giant people is focused on female giants. It’s because giantess content is MUCH more popular and visible (and prolific) than giant male content. The GTS people have a louder voice, as a group, so it’s much easier for them to coin terms that suit their needs and to have those terms catch on. The SW people can coin their own terms too, of course, but those are much less likely to catch on and become commonly used, because they don’t get tons of use and aren’t being constantly reinforced, except maybe in very small groups.

Also, people who like giantess content tend to pay very little, if any, attention to other size content that isn’t giantess-related. If they don’t intentionally go looking for it (and why would they?), they’re not likely to see it in the first place. For them, it’s as if the rest of the size community doesn’t exist…they live in a bubble. If something doesn’t exist in their world, they’re probably not going to feel compelled to create special nomenclature for it.

It’s the same reason why normies don’t have a word for male giants: because they spend almost zero time thinking about giant people (of either gender). Why would they need special vocabulary for something that simply isn’t on their radar? Even in fiction, giant people are not common. The lack of vocabulary comes from a general lack of caring.

My size identity is “normal human size,” so no, my size identity doesn’t affect my body image. I’m 5’10", which is pretty average. Boring answer, I know.

@TakoAlice8 said in Does your size identity affect your body image?:

I hope you can see, obviously I identify strictly as a tiny

No, I CAN’T see…because you’re just so very, very small. Maybe jump up and down and wave your arms around a bit?

(I hope that made you feel small, if only for a split second.)

@BryTheGuy Yes and no. I like the idea of the micro-sized shrinking, but once they enter the human body, it kind of kills the potential for interaction. Tinyness without interaction seems like “theoretical tinyness” rather than “tinyness in practice.” It’s like being a parent…if I’m the father of a child who I’ve never met, and I don’t even know my child exists, does that make me a parent? Technically, yes, it does. In theory. But not in any real practical way.

When the tinies are actually inside someone’s body, it doesn’t really “feel” like they’re tiny. It feels like they’re explorers on an alien planet, because the stuff they’re interacting with isn’t stuff that we recognize from our everyday lives. It’s alien. If the tinies are thumb-sized, we have a reference point for their tinyness, because ordinary objects like pencils are now significantly larger than they are. But when the tinies are inside a human body and surrounded by giant red blood cells, we don’t have an obvious reference point for their tinyness. It’s like the question about the tree falling in the forest…

@skysayl We could probably make the series of words even MORE random!

“Lose consciousness atop the grooves of the phalangeal extremity belonging to myself”

[giant makes a persistent subtle buzzing sound to gaslight the tiny into thinking the buzzing is coming from her own brain]

Girl, you so fine, you should sleep on my fingerprint and arrange your body into an S shape.

Because you’re a “prints S.”

This isn’t related to roleplaying or size stuff specifically, but I would disagree with the idea that cheating is the point when you romantically desire someone else more than your partner. The thing about desire is that it’s not really something we can consciously control. I think it’s very unrealistic to expect that you will never see or encounter anyone who seems more desirable to you than your partner in some way, especially considering that there are eight billion people on this planet. What are the odds that the person you chose to build a relationship with is going to always and indefinitely be the most desirable person in the world to you? Very, very low. Plus people change, and relationships change over time, so you can’t expect desire to remain absolutely constant. That’s why long-term relationships are based on commitment and not on desire alone. That’s why it used to be so hard to get a divorce: it was meant to deter married people from abandoning their commitments just because they were having a bad day or a bad year, or because they saw a hot person in a bar and became infatuated.

I think there’s a world of difference between desire and action. I might hate my boss, and I might desperately want to wring his neck, but does that make me a murderer or a violent person? No. I’m not guilty of violence unless I act upon my desires, or unless I start making a plan to hurt my boss and I intend to follow through on that plan. When desire turns into action or serious intention, that’s when the line has been crossed. It’s the same way with cheating or with other “crimes.” Desire alone does not equal guilt.

Desire is involuntary, but action is voluntary. Action is something you can control, but desire is generally outside of your control…that’s the key difference. Why am I harping on this? Partly because I don’t want anyone to beat themselves up for something they can’t control. I don’t want anyone to beat themselves up for having perfectly natural and understandable desires that every human has. But the other reason is that I don’t want to see anyone use desire as an excuse. If you believe that having certain desires automatically makes you guilty, then it’s easier to rationalize certain behaviors to yourself. You might think, “I’m already guilty of cheating, because I desire someone else more than my partner…therefore I might as well do what my desires tell me to do, since I’m guilty either way!”

Yes, I have had size interactions in real life, but I was the one who initiated them, so I’m not sure if that still “counts.”

I’ve romantically/flirtatiously roleplayed size stuff with more than one girl I was potentially interested in. I did it in a normie-friendly, playful way, not in a kinky-sounding way or in a way that would set off a normal person’s creep-o-meter. I never told them it was a kink or a special interest of mine or anything like that, because:

• A) Why make it weird or awkward when it doesn’t need to be?
  (Also, I wouldn’t want someone to feel pressured to play along, or to like something just because I like it.)
• B) It’s an impossible fantasy anyway, with no chance of ever happening in real life, so why would they need to know?

When I did this roleplaying, there were a couple girls who got really, REALLY into it. They embraced being tiny and loved every second of it (and embraced the idea of staying tiny indefinitely). No, I don’t think they had a size kink, and I don’t think they were sexually turned on by the sizey stuff itself…I think they just really enjoyed the emotions (and the flirtation) that came with the fantasy. I think it’s a fantasy that speaks to something pretty universal in the female psyche, which is the same reason why Twilight and 50 Shades of Grey became so mega-popular. I never got a negative response from any of the girls I tried it on. Maybe a couple neutral responses, but most of the time, the responses were either positive or VERY positive.

The same personality types I like in real life: sweet, submissive, possibly shy (but not so shy that it’s impossible to interact with her), childlike (not childish).

And I’d definitely prefer if she enjoys being tiny, or at least doesn’t hate it once she’s had a chance to get used to it and get past the initial shock and fear.

@coolguy69 Yes, I do relate. I’m a straight guy, and everyone expects straight guys to be extremely into nudity and sexual content. But I’m “weird.” I’m generally not a fan of NSFW size content, although there are exceptions to that rule. When I DO enjoy the NSFW stuff, it’s not for the reasons you would expect…I usually enjoy the non-NSFW elements of it. And I’m also not into nudity…I prefer tinies to be clothed. (Although it can be great when a woman shrinks out of her clothes and has to wear makeshift clothes…depending on what the makeshift clothes are!) Strangely, I don’t consider myself to be asexual at all…I feel like my preferences would be less weird if I WERE asexual! At least then it would be “expected.”

And yeah, I don’t like cruel stuff at all (although lighthearted teasing and being “fake mean” to the tiny can be fun). There are a number of things in size content that are turnoffs for me, like tiny men, furry stuff, bodily functions, etc., and cruelty or sadism is definitely one of my turnoffs. The idea of being on either the giving end or the receiving end of ACTUAL mistreatment or meanness or anything truly degrading–either in fantasy or in real life–just makes me feel disgusted.

So I guess we’ll say my tastes are very “soft.” If super-violent, rapey size content is hard liquor, then I’m the one drinking a virgin strawberry daiquiri. (Interestingly, I don’t drink alcohol at all in real life, and I never have. I wonder if there’s some sort of relationship between my habits and preferences in one area of life and my proclivities in other areas. There probably is…at least a tiny bit.)

Personally, I’m skeptical of the claim that “these guys were dominated by women from an early age, so they eroticized their pain and turned it into pleasure.” That’s one possible explanation, but it could also be pure coincidence. We’re not hearing from all the guys who were dominated by women and DIDN’T develop a size kink, so we don’t really have any group we can use for comparison. I think most men who had these unpleasant childhood experiences probably wouldn’t be very forthcoming about it when talking with strangers or acquaintances…UNLESS they were trying to come up with a possible explanation for why they developed an unusual fixation. Searching for answers to that question might cause you to go to places where you wouldn’t otherwise go.

My mom was very domineering and controlling (and still is), and my sister took after my mom. As a kid, I was frequently dominated by both of them to varying degrees, even though my sister was two years younger than I was. I hated every second of it. I didn’t develop an interest in giantesses or being dominated. To this day, the thought of being dominated or degraded by a woman is a MASSIVE turn-off for me. Instead of being interested in giantesses, I had an interest in protecting tiny women (I’m definitely not a switch). I think I had this interest by the time I was six, if not younger, and I don’t remember it being triggered by a particular event or a particular piece of media.

Anyway, my childhood experience was somewhat similar to the experiences reported by these male GTS fans, and my interests went in completely the opposite direction, compared to theirs. I realize that I’m a minority in the size community, though. I also realize that my experience could be an exception, and exceptions don’t necessarily disprove the theory.

@littlest-lily See? Playing video games DOES lead to real-life violence!! If you grew up playing Tetris, you can’t resist the urge to insert snugly-fitting things into other things. It’s all downhill from there…