Best posts made by Olo

@SmolChlo Somehow I thought you’d like this one.

Trying to keep and modify “giant” seems futile. In English the suffix “-ess” is how a generic noun is “marked” as female. It’s a deliberately sexist construction, assuming the default person is male.

I think we’d be better off using another synonym altogether or even inventing entirely new words.

$9.99 BUY ONE GET ONE FREE!!! by Flagg3D

They make great stocking stuffers!

@miss-lillipants As threatened promised, on the occasion of Vore Day here’s my navel-gazing post on the joys of mouthplay and vore.

@Nyx

“He’s with me.”

Humblebrag of the Century.

I can’t tell you how gratified I am that you’re giving us Lhyr’s perspective. The Passageway must have caused some disruption in his dimension, too.

I’m not even going to speculate on the plot. Just hungry for more.

@foreverlurk I went looking for an online German translation of Gulliver’s Travels and I found this. Who knows what we’ll get this time?

Their Sacrifice Offering by Scalelover aka Shrunkenlover aka Donkboy

@i-am-insane I find that often the most enjoyable size smut features one or more participants who aren’t already size pervs but who eventually accommodate (or “awaken to”) a size encounter.

I also wanted to showcase headlong size thirst from a woman’s POV. The guy’s interests are secondary at this stage.

Only Shrinks by Thatgirlyouknow

Please note the tags

@foreverlurk said:

I much prefer “lilliputienne”.

German doesn’t seem to like double consonants like those in “Lilliput.” Their words for male and female inhabitants of Lilliput are Liliputaner and Lililputanerin.

I bought the first hard copy of Milo Manara’s Gulliveriana I came across, which was in France. When Gulliveriana finally has her big disagreement with the Empress of Lilliput, she calls the latter a “Lilliputasse.”

needs source

@i-am-insane When I was his age and I imagined trying to tell a girl that I wanted to be shrunk and go home in her panties, my hypothetical girl had an expression exactly like his.

@littlest-lily said:

There’s a lot of wood and string, with globs of stabilizing silicone clay at the bottom, but then at the top I now notice several tiny wheels of some kind. I lean in, eyes widening. “Holy crap, are those pulleys?”

F/m has been my primary interest for most of my fetish “career.” Over the years I have observed with increasing dismay and disgust how petty and entitled the loudest segment of F/m enthusiasts became, arrogating to themselves ownership of “the Giantess fetish” and demanding everyone in Size spaces recognize their authority and conform to their prescriptions. There’s nothing about F/m that requires such obnoxious behavior and it’s embarrassing to be associated with it.

The chief problem with “objectification” (in any context) is that it removes other people, erasing their personalities and needs and wants, and treating them as mere props in one’s own narrative. A male F/m fan who has a simplistic and rigid view of how giantesses are supposed to behave is indeed engaging in objectification of women in his fantasy. The remedy is to compose a fantasy featuring complex and varied characters, both male and female, such that everyone has different reactions to the scenario and more readers/viewers can find room for themselves or at least for their desires.

A physical fetish like Size is naturally going to “objectify” elements such as body parts, sensations, and emotional effects. There’s nothing wrong with that. F/m should focus on giant female bodies just as much as M/f should focus on giant male bodies. That’s what we’re here for. As a straight dude who enjoys M/f, I want to see/read how tiny women feel in the presence of giant men. That’s objectification I actively desire.

I completely sympathize with anyone tired of how hegemonic F/m has become in Size spaces. You have nothing to apologize for when venting your feelings on this subject.

needs source