Posts made by Olo
-
RE: Why liking M/f is not misogynistic
@i-am-insane To quote my own blog:
I am a full-on feminist. I espouse and practice affirmative and enthusiastic consent among real people. I support dignity, respect, and justice for all people everywhere. I abhor cruelty, dehumanization, and bullying, whether they are committed by individuals, institutions, nations, or faiths. I also sometimes get off to fantasies of shrinking, kidnapping, raping, and eating women (sometimes it’s the other way around).
If you find this difficult to comprehend, this might not be the blog for you. Or perhaps it is.
-
RE: Does size have the potential of going above and beyond a fetish community?
At one point in this thread I was going to refer to a hypothetical “FluffCon.” Turns out it already exists.
-
RE: Why liking M/f is not misogynistic
It seems to me that the basic error here is assuming that one’s sexual desires somehow reflect on one’s social values, particularly if one has a hidden or obscure kink. “This must be what they really think!” The human mind is never so simple, and it is capable of containing multiple contradictory thoughts and feelings. I used to think my size kinks said something profound about me, but all they really say about me is that I’m very creative.
-
RE: Hankey's Toys are bringin' the goods
@SallyFourth I suspect fear is an important element of the experience.
-
RE: Hankey's Toys are bringin' the goods
@Kisupure Full-body imaging + 3D printers
-
RE: Office Pets
@Mrgoblinging7 If you bring treats to the office, bring enough for everyone.
-
RE: Stay Still... I Need To Worm My Feet!
@Mrgoblinging7 Looks like she’s the worm.
-
RE: Cake Decoration For Your Birthday
@Mrgoblinging7 Can I provide my own frosting?
-
RE: Does size have the potential of going above and beyond a fetish community?
For better or worse, there is no single “size community” and there probably never will be. In the extremely unlikely event that size fantasy ever “goes mainstream,” it will almost certainly focus on a subset of size, leaving the rest of us to complain that we’re not being represented. With the exception of the F/m gatekeeping assholes, I think everyone has a legitimate grievance that their preferences have been ignored or ostracized.
Back when I was on Tumblr, I would frequently see a SFW/fluffy post that I liked and I would reblog it to my blog, which was otherwise filled with graphic size porn. I didn’t quite appreciate at the time that NFSW people who followed my blog would take that as an invitation to start harassing the SFW content creator, demanding that they post or roleplay in an NFSW context. When I realized that I stopped reblogging the fluffy posts, but even when I simply “liked” a SFW post the OP would block me. They had valid reasons for trying to avoid contact with NFSW size fans, but they would also shame them, declaring their SFW preferences to be “pure.” I have heard multiple accounts of similar interactions with SFW size fans, and I think @subasubaski’s concerns are valid.
I think it’s important to remember that when @Jitensha created both SizeCon and this forum, she didn’t want anyone to be excluded (this forum’s prohibition is on F/m content, not F/m fans). She made Daddy’s Dollhouse because she felt that NSFW M/f content (particularly non-con, violent, and cock-featuring content) was being disparaged on other SW sites. At the same time, we also welcome SFW/fluff here, and no one should feel required to engage with or be exposed to NFSW content they don’t want. That’s why we have tags (which should always be used).