Posts made by protect-tinies

I just asked this question on Tumblr. Thought it was worth posting here too.

Question for tinies:

Your wish is granted! You have the opportunity to shrink down to your ideal tiny size…whatever size that may be. But if you do, the shrinking process will have long-term side effects. You will stay tiny for twenty-four hours before growing back to normal size. Then you’ll stay normal-sized for twenty-four hours. Then you’ll shrink again and stay tiny for twenty-four hours, then you’ll be normal for twenty-four hours, and the pattern will continue repeating itself every twenty-four hours for the rest of your life. The cycle is irreversible. You will never be able to control your size. You will never be able to control the timing of your shrinking and growing.

If you choose not to shrink yourself, you will avoid the whole cycle of involuntary size-changing, but you will also be stuck at normal human size forever, with no possible way of ever becoming a tiny and making your fantasies real. (THE HORROR. ) Which do you choose?

@The-Big-G Never too smol for puns!! (If this joke even qualifies as a pun…)

@Olo “Without you, I’m nothing. But within you, I’m a snack!”

TINY GIRL: “What do you call a group of three barely visible tinies?”

GIANT GUY: “I don’t know. What do you call them?”

TINY GIRL: “…”

GIANT GUY: “Well? What’s the answer?”

TINY GIRL: “I just told you.”

@HHunter1 Ladies and gentlemen, I think we just found the M/f answer to the “giantess forces the shrunken person to clean her feet and paint her toenails” trope so ubiquitous in giant-female content. AT LONG LAST!! NO LONGER WILL THE GIANTESS COMMUNITY HAVE EXCLUSIVE OWNERSHIP OF ALL THE FAITHFUL STANDBY SIZEY TROPES! WE’RE FINALLY ON THE MAP, EVERYONE!!! 🥳

@SmolChlo Plus, if you’re up close and personal with the follicles as a tiny, they’re great for exfoliating and/or acupuncture.

[returns to brutalizing helpless tiny women with rough facial hair]

@miss-lillipants Speaking as someone who HAS recorded himself doing this stuff, I hate listening to my own voice too. Here’s my secret for success: I never listen to my own recordings. I just record myself narrating the script, do it all in one take, and then I listen to the first one or two seconds of the recording (just to make sure it recorded correctly) and turn it off as fast as I can. Then I post it online without doing any further “quality control.” To this day, I’ve never listened to one of my own recordings all the way through. Not even once. It’s a very effective tactic! You just have to resist the urge to be a perfectionist about it. (I think that perfectionism is what causes people to listen through their own recordings, looking for flaws and problems.)

@littlest-lily I would respond by immediately putting her in my mouth. Not because I intend to eat her. Just to show her who’s the pathetic one.

@SmolChlo Wait…you mean you’re NOT actually tiny and typing all of your posts by dancing on a phone/computer keyboard?? I WAS very impressed with your lack of typos, considering your circumstances, but now I retract my accolades!

@Deedee What a GREAT/TERRIBLE response…depending on your preference at this particular moment.

@Deedee That’s true…I’ve heard about guys who act creepy or aggressive on purpose and who actually TRY to get a negative response from women, because they get turned on when women shame them for something sexual, act like they’re pathetic and disgusting, and so on. Similar to a femdom kink (there’s probably some overlap). I guess we’ll never know how many of those guys there are and how many of them are just tone-deaf.

@Deedee said in Underfoot:

apparently many guys have trouble seeing any part of themselves (except that one) as inherently desirable.

I guess that explains the much-lamented phenomenon of guys sending unsolicited dick pics to women (which I personally have never done). When you think you’ve only got ONE good card in your hand, you lean on that one card pretty heavily. When you’re holding a hammer, everything looks like a nail…

I’m a guy who has a foot fetish and is also a microphile. And no, I’m not one of THOSE foot fetish guys…you know the ones I’m talking about. The creepy, obsessive guys who shove their fetish in everyone’s faces and appear to have no sense of personal boundaries (kind of like some of the guys who are into giantess content). Those guys make me cringe whenever I see them.

Regarding women with fetishes struggling to be heard, I wonder if that might not be a blessing in disguise. (Although I’m sure it’s still frustrating for female fetishists when they’re on the receiving end of certain assumptions, and I don’t mean to minimize that.) Here’s what I mean when I say it’s potentially a blessing. Society has a lot of negative labels for people with sexual proclivities that are considered undesirable. For instance, if I say the word “rapist” or “molester” or “pedophile,” people will immediately assume I’m talking about a man, not a woman. If I say “pervert,” people will assume I’m talking about a man. If I allude to someone being overly “enthusiastic” about anything sexual, people will assume I’m talking about a man unless I say otherwise. The word “fetishist” is kind of like the word “pervert”…it’s a label that generally thought of as something negative and undesirable. Again, if I say “fetishist,” people assume I’m talking about a man…it’s a word that describes “undesirable” sexual behavior, so the fact that people instinctively associate it with men is not surprising. It follows the same pattern as the other negative labels that have to do with sex. Sure, Quentin Tarantino’s foot fetish gets a lot of press and a lot of visibility, but at the cost of being the butt of a lot of jokes.

My point is that I think some people might shy away from recognizing women’s fetishes because they don’t like the idea of putting a traditionally male and traditionally negative or “gross” label on women. It seems like people are usually more reluctant to think of women as being “gross” or having gross attributes. A lot of them seem to be very attached to the idea that women are “sugar and spice and everything nice”–the idea that women are pure and innocent and not gross–and they don’t give up those ideas very easily. They don’t really want to believe that women are capable of “undesirable” behaviors in the same way men are. It ruins the sentimental illusion for them…kind of like going to Disney World and seeing the guy in the Mickey Mouse costume taking a break, smoking a cigarette with his giant cartoon head removed. An example: when you hear news stories about female middle school teachers sleeping with their male students, people are usually far more reluctant to call those teachers pedophiles, or to label it as an act of sexual assault, or to call the male students rape victims. If it were a male teacher with a female student, it would be a very different story.

Is it frustrating when people have these very common perceptions about women? Yes, it certainly can be, for a variety of reasons. But I think it could also be considered an unintentional compliment, depending on how you look at it. Personally, I’d rather have people give me the benefit of the doubt and be slow to jump to conclusions, instead of having them assume all sorts of negative things about me and label me a “deviant” if they ever suspect that I like feet, or if they suspect that I like tiny women. So for that reason, I’d call it a mixed blessing.

I say this a lot, but as always, I could be wrong.

Silly giant…nose-bopping is what you’re supposed to do to them AFTER they’re tiny!!

Just because I’ve never posted it here before. I made this a long while ago by editing royalty-free vector images (created by others) and combining them. It’s pretty much the only “size art” I’ve ever made. I like the fact that the hand is slightly blurred and out of focus compared to the tiny, which makes it look more like part of the background. That little “imperfection” wasn’t really intentional, but I liked it, so I kept it that way.