Posts made by miss-lillipants

@Olo said:

Jude Doyle goes into much greater detail and has some important insights here.

This Is How You Lose the Sex Wars

Trying to pick a pathway through forty years of the ugliest conflict in feminism.

This is a nice reflection and really highlights the complexities of reconciling seemingly very polarised perspectives. It’s possible, and I think a lot of people overthink it. But also very difficult especially with so much distraction (sometimes intentional, sometimes not) from larger systemic issues, and social contexts constantly in flux.

@ConceptCorner01 plenty of fictional characters and/or real-life celebrities are subject to people’s fantasies. I believe MacroJack has also used the model for Isaac Clarke, titular protagonist of Dead Space, as a growing, horny behemoth - which I am also not entirely opposed to.

Another point being that the number of decent quality X-rated macro/rampage videos is already very rare. We are not picky (nor can we afford to be, sometimes, sadly).

While I think the Sabrina Carpenter cover thing is not the best example to talk about a woman’s expression of their sexuality etc. (because is she? Or does she want to promote her music? Maybe, maybe not, it’s certainly got us talking about it), it’s opened up a much-needed discussion around “choice feminism” more broadly, i.e. the re-focussing (distracting, even) on the individual level rather than the systemic.

Here’s a snippet of a lecture that I saw the other day that gives some historical context https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSkKVJVUx/

I’m also for appropriate tagging on content.

You mention DA and I assume you also mean to make this a general statement about posting images on any platform including this forum. Because I do have a question (probably to the admins) about tags and how/if they are working on here:

I tend to access the forum on my phone and I find that tags don’t seem to work? Or they don’t show up anywhere noticeable. I checked some of my own posts, which I know for certain are tagged using those on the list, and they’re not visible. Hence why I put some tags in the title (without trying to bloat it). Also, pretty sure there’s a mandatory minimum of like 3 tags before anything can be posted.

Can someone confirm if it’s a different case when on a computer? Or if tags serve a different function other than a label (e.g. are used specifically/only for filtering content)?

@DFP you’re welcome!

I can also appreciate the implication (although not actually said as I have no wish to put words in your mouth) that penile insertion might be more about the insertee’s pleasure at being so helpless.

No implication really. It might be more popular amongst people who fantasise being the insertee, but it’s not exclusively for them then either (see: posts above on sounding, and also consider non-participants as either witness/voyeur characters or a reader/consumer of media).

@DFP said:

On the insertion thing, I have to assume most people have never had a catheter. Having something shoved into your urethra doesn’t seem Dominant to me.

I don’t have a penis, but I understand the pain and discomfort involved in shoving a rod in a hole that’s not meant to have something in it. But I would say the pleasure in insertion scenarios (of any kind, including vore I would say) isn’t necessarily from the physical sensation - at least not entirely. Pleasure and other feelings (e.g. powerful/lessness, humiliation, fear, anxiety) don’t always require something physical. It’s the experiencial narrative, the situation, and the awareness of it (as the person experiencing it or witnessing it).

For example: the insertee being so small that the the giant can’t even feel them. It’s not about how it physically feels then, because you can’t feel them at all, but some people love it for a range of reasons.

Another example: a dildo type of scenario. If I’m drawing parallels to the real world, statistically say, vaginal penetration is often not enough to cause an orgasm. Frankly, after a while of just penetration, it doesn’t really do much anyway in terms of pleasure. You have to compensate by stimulating something else. In the case of a GTS scenario using a person as a human dildo, the extra stimulation there is the use of a human being (or humanoid, whatever) as a sex toy and whatever feelings and pleasures that tends to elicit.

Short-medium answers:

I prefer mouthplay to vore. And to me, the appeal of mouthplay is its intimacy and the thrill of its precariousness. It is both threatening, but - as a fluff/romance fan - also an exercise in trust.

Whereas I’ve only relatively recently gotten into cockvore. And I’ve discovered that the the appeal there is the clear show of power, dominance and especially humiliation. The insertee can be a single person, a collective, a bus or train, or whole building - I don’t care, so long as they are miniscule in comparison to the giant. No tight squeezes; just drop, slide, disappear. Barely what you’d call a toy - more like fodder.

@Olo said:

@Jötunn Not just this collage but any image or description of M/f scenarios.

Fetish content that heavily emphasises the powerlessness of tiny women - and posted in the context of said fetish - is an unreliable indicator of whether someone is misogynistic or not. Plenty of people readily give that away themselves, without having to use media.

@SmolChlo said in:

Playfully tumbling down each pectoral like a grassy hill. Feeling the soft texture of his cotton shirt that’s saturated with his scent soothes me like no other. Big appreciation for men’s chest

“Hills and mounds, joy abounds.” -Arrietty, probably

@Olo said:

You got my nips all perky.

Tiddy nubbins deserve love and plenty of attention too.

Text (sorry )

So I love the image of a tiny lady on a man’s chest; sitting, reclining, lying down, just relaxing. They might each be doing their own thing, or he could be holding up a book or his phone so they can both share some leisurely activity. There are lots of great images out there with some take on that general idea - you could say it’s a bit of a classic scene.

As someone who sympathises with the tiny’s perspective, I like to think about the other sensory experience of being on a giant’s chest - the magnified texture of his shirt or skin, the whisper-roaring sound of his breath, the bassline rhythm of his heartbeat…other such wonderous things a tiny might pick up in such intimacy.

I like to daydream on my personal favourite: the sculpted mounds of a man’s pectorals. A tiny running her little hands over her surroundings, feeling and admiring their firmness. It’s a weird juxtaposing consistency of a soft solid and a solid softness, a muscle flexed but not tense. If the giant is feeling a bit cheeky, he’d press her into him, make sure she gets a more holistic experience of him; his finger on her back, holding her down, her entire body smushed into just a miniscule patch of his skin in comparison. She might squirm in a panic (or pretend to be in one) but he won’t budge, enjoying the feeling of her helplessness far too much to let the opportunity go.

It could go a few different ways from there, but I just wanted to focus on that initial contact. Also just wanted to send some appreciation to men’s chests : )

@littlest-lily said:

so what I’m talking about is MMM/f 🤭

Sign me tf up for multi-man tomfoolery.

@Olo said:

What might be challenging for someone of the SW perspective is to realistically model how a male Biggo who never thought about being attracted to a SW before might “come around” to it. This includes, of course, what sort of stimulation he might expect or hope for from such an encounter. How does he view his own sexual self, and what would he think of a man who gets it on with a mouse-sized woman?
It might be simpler to go after a guy with microphilia, but wouldn’t it be hotter to have to make the case to him (and the reader)?

Yes! I was referring mostly to writing physiological responses + feelings of arousal for men (because I like to include little details like that, even if it’s not the major focus, because the human body is lovely and fascinating. Helps the reader relate, I think). @foreverlurk, you’re probably right in that it’s probably not that complicated. But @Olo, you’ve also brought up a very good point!

This was something I only recently noticed in my own process/preferences: that giants were sort of neutral about the size difference. Like it is an objective truth that he is big and she is small. When the initial attraction develops, it is primarily around her as a person, but he might develop an appeal for her tinyness later. Once that happens though, the challenge is describing that realisation, the moment of discovery, that being able to hold her in the palm of his hand is actually a massive turn on and how it makes him feel. Is he conflicted? Does he embrace it? When that is done well, then I am also well done.

@i-am-insane said:

I’m going to be honest: ‘brested boobily’ isn’t some ignorance of a female… anything. That is just… truly bad writing, lol.

Absolutely it is. Arguably, even without the deliberate hyperbole, any example that reflects a lack of research is bad writing and warrants the hope that it is, best case, satire.

@skysayl said:

Get a male friend to preread and draw attention to this specific aspect. I’m sure they would be happy to help you with the accuracy. I love when someone corrects me somewhere I don’t have the expertise in, just makes the writing better.

Ahaha yes, that would be the easiest route. I’ll have to sort out my many other confidence issues but for now will settle on reading other works, or asking my partner “so what your peen do when…?” And taking notes.