@SmolChlo Just keep a canister of helium on you at all times. 
Best posts made by Olo
-
RE: zHEIGHTgeistposted in Size Life Chat
-
Missing tag in Size Life Chatposted in Bug Reports
For some reason, “Cock” is not on the tag menu for posts in Size Life Chat.
-
RE: The space between SFW and NSFWposted in Size Life Chat
@littlest-lily I’d like to clarify that what seems to be proposed here is a SFW-focused space outside of Daddy’s Dollhouse. If not, then close consultation with @Jitensha would be in order.
While my abiding interest in Size Fantasy is sexual, I would be delighted to see what a SFW-focused space would produce. I’m fascinated by Sizey world-building, which tends to be more thought-through by creators who aren’t mainly chasing their Size thirst.
Would this proposed space still be about GM/SW?
-
RE: Chopsticksposted in Artwork
@smolchlo That’s all I meant: it sounded like The Snootches and Other Stories.
-
RE: zHEIGHTgeistposted in Size Life Chat
@i-am-insane There are not a few biggo-identifying folks who indeed enjoy leaving a guilt-free swath of destruction through populated areas.
-
RE: Chopsticksposted in Artwork
@smolchlo Jacek Chmielnik was born in 1953 (d. 2007). I’m not as old as that, but I am older than he was in the photo I use for my avatar.
-
RE: zHEIGHTgeistposted in Size Life Chat
@littlest-lily This is how I’ve identified another “axis” for categorizing size fantasies. Unaware, giant or tiny, falls on the “Indifferent” end of the spectrum, where people of a different size are relatively anonymous and undifferentiated, and the protagonist is usually only talking to themselves. The other end of the spectrum is “Intimate,” where who the differently-sized people are matters greatly.
-
RE: A Little Wagerposted in Artwork
@bigcuddlygiant I presume the different sizes connote different denominations. Do they stack, I wonder?
-
RE: zHEIGHTgeistposted in Size Life Chat
@foreverlurk I think he did a fair job of acknowledging that his personal preferences were not universal among Size fans. Where he could (as in the passage you cite) he used gender-neutral terms, which is proper because the sentiment expressed is applicable to all Size configurations.

