@tiny-ivy Oh you didn’t invalidate me, that could be a possibility 
Best posts made by TakoAlice8
-
RE: Why do you want to be shrunk?posted in Size Fantasy Chat
-
RE: DeviantArt Content Policiesposted in Size Life Chat
@Olo This was very well explained on your website. I really wish wix never bought deviantart.
-
RE: Belonging to a famous giant/essposted in Size Fantasy Chat
@ShifterSilver I am a bit apprehensive about having size fantasies about celebrities because I don’t know if they consent. But I would want to belong to a giant alternative Japanese band member.
-
RE: DeviantArt Content Policiesposted in Size Life Chat
@Olo yeah, deviantart really started to go down hill when wix bought it, and it doesn’t seem to be stopping
-
RE: Beards or no?posted in Size Fantasy Chat
@Olo I am personally not attracted to beards and facial hair in general
-
RE: Why liking M/f is not misogynisticposted in Size Life Chat
@Olo This is a good blog, exactly what I was trying to do to validate people on this site.
I know this is going to get off topic but are you a size switch? I want to know so I can know how to better respect you.
-
RE: How would you like your SW?posted in Size Fantasy Chat
@i-am-insane (Me an SW) Oh hey guys, what are we talking about?
-
RE: I wish there was a term for exclusively male giantsposted in Size Life Chat
@DFP said in I wish there was a term for exclusively male giants:
The problem isn’t that women are special. It’s more that women are the exception. So, we come up with words like “giant” to designate large people, but then we start to show female giants, and we need a way to designate them, so we create the term “giantess”. The problem isn’t the language. It’s the way people use it. Because people are too lazy to type 4 extra letters “giant” gets used for big folks regardless of gender. Then we begin to label people that do correctly say “giantess” as sexist and insult them for speaking properly. It’s somewhat amazing to me because I’d get the same label if I started writing “men” regardless of gender so I could avoid typing 2 more letters. It’s not exceptionalism so much as laziness and political correctness run amok.
I’d suggest that within this community if nowhere else, the word “giant” be used exclusively to refer to males of size and “giantess” be used to refer to females of size. Also, any time someone doesn’t use the correct terms they be politely corrected.
Women being the exception actually better describes how I feel about the term giantess. I guess the term “giantess” upsets me because it reminds me how much our language is rooted in patriarchy, with people thinking the default gender is male.
About using the word “giant” to exclusively refer to males of size. What would people use to describe people of size outside of the traditional gender binary? Xgiant or something like that?
-
RE: Does anyone feel this way about F/mposted in Size Life Chat
@Olo Oh now that I see it, I wasn’t upset with people in F/m being “Objectified”. I was upset with how hegemonic F/m is again. I suppose because I am ace I feel uncomfortable with “Objectification” in fetish media and so I have a hard time understanding how it could not make someone uncomfortable. I also tend to be overly empathetic towards fictional people so that was also probably why I got uncomfortable.
I am still trying to figure out what kind of size media I like. It turns out I am my brain is not as tolerant size media with sexual undertones as I thought.
Alright keep being kinky.
-
RE: Asexual Thoughtsposted in Size Life Chat
@Calypsa I feel the exact same way as you do. I am asexual and never liked size media with sexual undertones a lot even though I can tolerate them. I have always been into non sexual size media.
But I honestly don’t just like gentle, I like it when the giant teases the tiny. I also like a yandere giants and giants that are dominant or evil in a fun cartoony way(like the evil dr from Phineas and Ferb) that is not sexual too.