• Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    1. Home
    2. TakoAlice8
    3. Best
    • Profile
    • Following 41
    • Followers 7
    • Topics 38
    • Posts 182
    • Best 125
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 1

    Best posts made by TakoAlice8

    • RE: Belonging to a famous giant/ess

      @ShifterSilver I am a bit apprehensive about having size fantasies about celebrities because I don’t know if they consent. But I would want to belong to a giant alternative Japanese band member.

      posted in Size Fantasy Chat
      TakoAlice8
      TakoAlice8
    • RE: Why liking M/f is not misogynistic

      @Olo This is a good blog, exactly what I was trying to do to validate people on this site.

      I know this is going to get off topic but are you a size switch? I want to know so I can know how to better respect you.

      posted in Size Life Chat
      TakoAlice8
      TakoAlice8
    • RE: Beards or no?

      @Olo I am personally not attracted to beards and facial hair in general

      posted in Size Fantasy Chat
      TakoAlice8
      TakoAlice8
    • RE: I wish there was a term for exclusively male giants

      @DFP said in I wish there was a term for exclusively male giants:

      The problem isn’t that women are special. It’s more that women are the exception. So, we come up with words like “giant” to designate large people, but then we start to show female giants, and we need a way to designate them, so we create the term “giantess”. The problem isn’t the language. It’s the way people use it. Because people are too lazy to type 4 extra letters “giant” gets used for big folks regardless of gender. Then we begin to label people that do correctly say “giantess” as sexist and insult them for speaking properly. It’s somewhat amazing to me because I’d get the same label if I started writing “men” regardless of gender so I could avoid typing 2 more letters. It’s not exceptionalism so much as laziness and political correctness run amok.

      I’d suggest that within this community if nowhere else, the word “giant” be used exclusively to refer to males of size and “giantess” be used to refer to females of size. Also, any time someone doesn’t use the correct terms they be politely corrected.

      Women being the exception actually better describes how I feel about the term giantess. I guess the term “giantess” upsets me because it reminds me how much our language is rooted in patriarchy, with people thinking the default gender is male.

      About using the word “giant” to exclusively refer to males of size. What would people use to describe people of size outside of the traditional gender binary? Xgiant or something like that?

      posted in Size Life Chat
      TakoAlice8
      TakoAlice8
    • RE: Does anyone feel this way about F/m

      @Olo Oh now that I see it, I wasn’t upset with people in F/m being “Objectified”. I was upset with how hegemonic F/m is again. I suppose because I am ace I feel uncomfortable with “Objectification” in fetish media and so I have a hard time understanding how it could not make someone uncomfortable. I also tend to be overly empathetic towards fictional people so that was also probably why I got uncomfortable.

      I am still trying to figure out what kind of size media I like. It turns out I am my brain is not as tolerant size media with sexual undertones as I thought.

      Alright keep being kinky.

      posted in Size Life Chat
      TakoAlice8
      TakoAlice8
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
    • 8
    • 9
    • 9 / 9