Do you have any size kinks or interests that you feel are unusual?
-
@i-am-insane said:
The giga/whatever male to the normal/micro female; there’s a bunch where the woman’s in the ‘I’m so big compared to them they might as well be a bug’s bug’ driver seat, but as much as I find women hot I viewpoint well through guys
Yes! I’m someone who is aroused by my partner’s arousal - I like to see and hear how turned on they are by the situation. So for sizekink, in a giant’s case, if being large and dominating (“in charge”, if you will) is arousing/enjoyable, then I’d love to hear it; the whys and what it does to him, how it turns him on. This is part of why I like literal giant scenarios - it’s about the giant being big compared to everything, not just the tiny being small compared to him. It’s one of those things that M/m has a lot more of, which I appreciate, but…again, I’m not the intended audience so, it only does so much.
It’s something I’d like to be able explore in my own writing, but I’m worried about inaccurately describing the small but specific effects of arousal on the male body. It stems from having read badly written women (think: “she breasted boobily” and other things that make you go “that’s not how that works…”).
-
@littlest-lily Size is definitely more than a kink to me, and a good narrative is very important in how invested I get. So 100% agree there.
As for micro, it’s a rarity in SW for sure! I was a bit skeptical of it when I first found your content, but I got so hooked on your writing and your giant that I couldn’t stop reading. And I definitely came around on micro as a result. That aforementioned narrative is SO important!
-
@miss-lillipants said in Do you have any size kinks or interests that you feel are unusual?:
but I’m worried about inaccurately describing the small but specific effects of arousal on the male body. It stems from having read badly written women (think: “she breasted boobily” and other things that make you go “that’s not how that works…”).
Get a male friend to preread and draw attention to this specific aspect. I’m sure they would be happy to help you with the accuracy.
I love when someone corrects me somewhere I don’t have the expertise in, just makes the writing better. -
@ChiisanaKurisu Though I am not asexual myself, I often find myself more attracted to the dynamics of a M/f relationship than the actual “sex” itself. In fact, the content could feature nothing sexual at all, but if the relationship is well-established and they do a good job making it sensual…
-
@skysayl said:
Get a male friend to preread and draw attention to this specific aspect. I’m sure they would be happy to help you with the accuracy. I love when someone corrects me somewhere I don’t have the expertise in, just makes the writing better.
Ahaha yes, that would be the easiest route. I’ll have to sort out my many other confidence issues
but for now will settle on reading other works, or asking my partner “so what your peen do when…?” And taking notes. -
@miss-lillipants I’m going to be honest: ‘brested boobily’ isn’t some ignorance of a female… anything. That is just… truly bad writing, lol.
That said, even though I know objectively that can’t be the case, it’s always weird to me when women are turned on by men; there’s porn or whatever, but that’s always so male written and often flat out male fantasy I kind of dismiss that out of hand as being fantasy. I think it flavors into my ideas a bit: I try to imagine what is motivating the woman and she’s never just… into it. It’s either, A, she’s getting something else through it she’s enjoying (part of the reason I enjoy multi-size, because then she can be in charge of smaller women) or, B, she doesn’t have a choice.
Power is choice.
-
@i-am-insane said:
I’m going to be honest: ‘brested boobily’ isn’t some ignorance of a female… anything. That is just… truly bad writing, lol.
Absolutely it is. Arguably, even without the deliberate hyperbole, any example that reflects a lack of research is bad writing and warrants the hope that it is, best case, satire.
-
@blehb said in Do you have any size kinks or interests that you feel are unusual?:
Rope bondage is lovely even outside of size though. I definitely wouldn’t complain about seeing the two mesh more!
At least in my mind it is. I’ve watched tutorials and er, “demonstrations” and it does require some skills. You must also know how to quickly cut the ropes if your partner wants out, without hurting her. It’s that bond of trust that resonates with me, akin to the “you’re so tiny I could hurt you if I’m not careful but you trust me still” of SW that makes me melt.
If you find that hentai let me know!
@blehb said in Do you have any size kinks or interests that you feel are unusual?:
As for micro, it’s a rarity in SW for sure!
From my own anecdotal observations, it’s not that rare for women, but it’s rarer for us giant to truly appreciate that size range. It’s a shame because I think it allows so much freedom in shrinking scenarios.
For me, it opens up a different side than the usual gentle and caring giant. The terror and sheer domination it allows, more range to “play” with her size, slightly oblivious and playful, having her beg and think “okay I’m small enough now I’m sure he won’t shrink me again!”, just for me to go “Guess again, bug!” Zaaaaap. I love it sm
@skysayl said in Do you have any size kinks or interests that you feel are unusual?:
Get a male friend to preread and draw attention to this specific aspect.
Ivolunteerastribute.gif
I’m probably biased, I think in general men are less complicated than women when it comes to arousal, or simply more straightforward? In the context of the size kink, I do have some very specific interactions with SW I’ve not seen describe that often, though, that don’t require direct access to my dick. Again, I’m biased because of my size-rotted brain, but I think some SW underestimate how some simple interactions can make us drool with desire.
-
@foreverlurk said:
I think some SW underestimate how some simple interactions can make us drool with desire.
Some of this comes down to how “naturally” a (relatively giant) man would be attracted to or aroused by a (relatively tiny) woman. Many size fantasists tend to project their kinks onto the objects of their desires, sometimes going so far as to explicitly state that their differently-sized partner “has always secretly wanted this.” That’s convenient, but sometimes it can be so convenient as to disrupt plausibility.
What might be challenging for someone of the SW perspective is to realistically model how a male Biggo who never thought about being attracted to a SW before might “come around” to it. This includes, of course, what sort of stimulation he might expect or hope for from such an encounter. How does he view his own sexual self, and what would he think of a man who gets it on with a mouse-sized woman?
It might be simpler to go after a guy with microphilia, but wouldn’t it be hotter to have to make the case to him (and the reader)?
-
@Olo said in Do you have any size kinks or interests that you feel are unusual?:
What might be challenging for someone of the SW perspective is to realistically model how a male Biggo who never thought about being attracted to a SW before might “come around” to it
Hehe like I said, I’m fully conscious of my own bias, I was talking from my own perspective as a certified, unrepenting microphile. Honestly it probably wouldn’t take much to get me going when in company of a tiny lady, that’s for sure. Shrinking is already so hot in itself!
But the point you mention is close to home as I’ve always liked to imagine the SW as a normie, not as a macrophile. But deep down inside, I hope she comes around to liking the experience of being smol. Part Stockholm syndrome, part self-discovery, and part because… I’m such a nice giant.
-
@foreverlurk said:
But deep down inside, I hope she comes around to liking the experience of being smol.
Realizing that aiding this process is his job is an important part of the journey.
-
@Olo said:
What might be challenging for someone of the SW perspective is to realistically model how a male Biggo who never thought about being attracted to a SW before might “come around” to it. This includes, of course, what sort of stimulation he might expect or hope for from such an encounter. How does he view his own sexual self, and what would he think of a man who gets it on with a mouse-sized woman?
It might be simpler to go after a guy with microphilia, but wouldn’t it be hotter to have to make the case to him (and the reader)?Yes! I was referring mostly to writing physiological responses + feelings of arousal for men (because I like to include little details like that, even if it’s not the major focus, because the human body is lovely and fascinating. Helps the reader relate, I think). @foreverlurk, you’re probably right in that it’s probably not that complicated. But @Olo, you’ve also brought up a very good point!
This was something I only recently noticed in my own process/preferences: that giants were sort of neutral about the size difference. Like it is an objective truth that he is big and she is small. When the initial attraction develops, it is primarily around her as a person, but he might develop an appeal for her tinyness later. Once that happens though, the challenge is describing that realisation, the moment of discovery, that being able to hold her in the palm of his hand is actually a massive turn on and how it makes him feel. Is he conflicted? Does he embrace it? When that is done well, then I am also well done.
-
@skysayl Can’t believe there are others who are also bothered by tiny males.
I’m a straight guy, I had to acclimate myself to the abundance of tiny males in size kink material so that they won’t affect my experience as much.
I can’t quite explain why I find that a turnoff, but there are a lot of otherwise great works where I wish the tiny was a girl instead of a guy. Tiny girls kick that primitive part of my brain on fire; tiny guys (often) kill the mood a bit.
-
@BigCuddlyGiant Oooh, this is such a unique approach to things! I love it!!! I’ve played around with the concept of androids before, but more as a world building thing. Now I have a new perspective to look at it from.
-
@Olo I feel like a lot of M/f vore tends to be on the soft vore side of things as well. I imagine if you go more extreme than that, there might be a bit more pushback- on top if being an M/f pairing.
And while I do wish there was more M/f content in a similar style, I really love M/m stuff! There are sooo many fantastic artists and writers for it. Sometimes they will even dabble in M/f and it’s like Christmas.
