Best posts made by miss-lillipants

@DFP said:

On the insertion thing, I have to assume most people have never had a catheter. Having something shoved into your urethra doesn’t seem Dominant to me.

I don’t have a penis, but I understand the pain and discomfort involved in shoving a rod in a hole that’s not meant to have something in it. But I would say the pleasure in insertion scenarios (of any kind, including vore I would say) isn’t necessarily from the physical sensation - at least not entirely. Pleasure and other feelings (e.g. powerful/lessness, humiliation, fear, anxiety) don’t always require something physical. It’s the experiencial narrative, the situation, and the awareness of it (as the person experiencing it or witnessing it).

For example: the insertee being so small that the the giant can’t even feel them. It’s not about how it physically feels then, because you can’t feel them at all, but some people love it for a range of reasons.

Another example: a dildo type of scenario. If I’m drawing parallels to the real world, statistically say, vaginal penetration is often not enough to cause an orgasm. Frankly, after a while of just penetration, it doesn’t really do much anyway in terms of pleasure. You have to compensate by stimulating something else. In the case of a GTS scenario using a person as a human dildo, the extra stimulation there is the use of a human being (or humanoid, whatever) as a sex toy and whatever feelings and pleasures that tends to elicit.

@DFP you’re welcome!

I can also appreciate the implication (although not actually said as I have no wish to put words in your mouth) that penile insertion might be more about the insertee’s pleasure at being so helpless.

No implication really. It might be more popular amongst people who fantasise being the insertee, but it’s not exclusively for them then either (see: posts above on sounding, and also consider non-participants as either witness/voyeur characters or a reader/consumer of media).

While I think the Sabrina Carpenter cover thing is not the best example to talk about a woman’s expression of their sexuality etc. (because is she? Or does she want to promote her music? Maybe, maybe not, it’s certainly got us talking about it), it’s opened up a much-needed discussion around “choice feminism” more broadly, i.e. the re-focussing (distracting, even) on the individual level rather than the systemic.

Here’s a snippet of a lecture that I saw the other day that gives some historical context https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSkKVJVUx/

@Olo said:

Jude Doyle goes into much greater detail and has some important insights here.

This Is How You Lose the Sex Wars

Trying to pick a pathway through forty years of the ugliest conflict in feminism.

This is a nice reflection and really highlights the complexities of reconciling seemingly very polarised perspectives. It’s possible, and I think a lot of people overthink it. But also very difficult especially with so much distraction (sometimes intentional, sometimes not) from larger systemic issues, and social contexts constantly in flux.

@foreverlurk haha true, trope is probably not the right word. Whatever the equivalent is for an entire plotline.

If you’d still like to pursue some writing exercise, but having trouble with direction, you could consider doing a series of separate short stories set in a particular universe, rather than a single overarching story (which can come later if you figure something out).

@tiny-ivy I think green is referencing a scene from Zoolander.

Great finds btw am definitely down on this potential trend.

@littlest-lily I’m very invested in this story. Really love the attention to details and how personal your writing is

@Technomage said in An appreciation for GIANTS:

Of course it’s all relative, I’d feel as turned on as a giant if I saw a normal sized girl roaming around, I’d have to grab her immediately and I’d have a good time.

And I think that’s true for some people and to some extent for others, hence the post in the first place. In saying that, absolutely agree that it’s really lovely to learn and share our own preferences, kinks and thoughts with others with the same/similar interests

@Olo that’s when a helping hand wouldn’t go astray

@Nyx he do a protec

@Nyx said in An appreciation for GIANTS:

I’ve seen it argued that there is more intimacy when it comes to shrinking and that the normal-sized person and the shrunken person can focus more on one another. In growth, the rest of the world is often involved (which I happen to like). This intimacy may be appealing to a lot of people.

Oh I remember reading something like this, that’s a good point. I was wondering if that, on top of this, a lot of guys might feel uncomfortable because of how exposed a giant would be (or the though of being so public). But I could simply be projecting.

@Nyx thank you! Hoping to create a little more

@littlest-lily said in Hypnotizing:

meager attempts to make him sound young and dumb lol

I think you’re doing a great job channelling obnoxious college dude. Like it’s making me uneasy. But I am hooked, very curious as to where this will go!

@Olo said in Let Me Get This Straight:

The neglect of what has been called the “ecology” of giants is a major obstacle to me enjoying a lot of true giant|ess smut.

I’m also glad to see others notice the difference is demands/expectations for logistics between SW/GT and SM/GTS content. I totally understand and appreciate wanting to rationalise an improbable thing into reality - magic, science (known or unknown), aliens, etc. People are so creative and amazing with what they know, but sometimes I just think, “why is this important?” Sometimes I just want to enjoy a giant for the sake of him being a giant - the practical side of being a giant in a world that probably can’t support him is interesting, but sometimes not crucial. At the risk of sounding dismissive, it is a fantasy after all.

In the end, the giant man is my object, and what he does is what I wish for him to do, and what I wish to witness - just as giantesses, despite their position of power, are the object of someone else’s (mostly men’s) desire. I think a lot of straight men find being literal giants hard to reconcile because of how so many fantasies are tailored them - they don’t need an excuse to put women into positions, but when those tables turn and men become the focus of someone else’s fantasy, it’s got to work for them, which centres them again (even if it’s got nothing to do with them). There are exceptions of course, and the beauty of fetishes is how varied and diverse they are.

Your original post was cute and funny but it really does reflect the push-back I’ve read from guys who are clearly very resistant to the idea. In saying that, I go back to my initial response being:

Yeah, nice try convincing us that any of that bothers you at all