Underfoot
-
@Olo shape is what’s most important to me (high arches, long toes) but odor plays a big part as well. I haven’t come across any super stinky feet but the scent they give off when I’m giving a massage has definitely caused sudden arousal
It’s rare bc of how shy men can be about their feet but the few times I’ve given a foot massage, I usually pretend I’m tiny and really get into my role as a little foot slave lol… I think my foot fetish compliments my macrophilia fetish pretty well
-
@Deedee I completely agree! Hopefully men will one day realize that their feet are desirable and deserving of worship
-
@SmolChlo Little trick I learned, when you get to that state in a relationship, tell them you have a thing and get him some cheap lotion for his feet. He won’t think his feet are naturally attractive, but if he’s thinking “Hey I can do this for my girlfriend and that will make them attractive” he feels like he’s achieving that status and will accept it.
Why are you reading this and not messaging me?
-
@Deedee so don’t aggressively grab his ankle while shouting show me them toes boy!!
-
@SmolChlo Hey that’ll totally work on some.
-
@littlest-lily said in Underfoot:
Part of it is the fact that I’m into almost any body part as long as it’s gigantic, but there is something extra about being down on the floor at his feet where I’m most vulnerable, or about being pinned under a single toe - there’s an extra layer of domination/humiliation/playfulness there that I enjoy a whole lot.
That’s exactly how I feel about feet. Like I looked at the subreddit and my thoughts were just like “Yeah, some of these are really nice looking.” but it’s not content I’m going to be looking for in the future. On the other hand, the first story in the article about her having to lick the guy’s feet sounds very appealing to me. It’s definitely more the domination aspect of it than the actual feet to me.
-
@Olo
Idk what I’m ever going to do with this information but that’s very nice to know~ -
I’m a guy who has a foot fetish and is also a microphile. And no, I’m not one of THOSE foot fetish guys…you know the ones I’m talking about. The creepy, obsessive guys who shove their fetish in everyone’s faces and appear to have no sense of personal boundaries (kind of like some of the guys who are into giantess content). Those guys make me cringe whenever I see them.
Regarding women with fetishes struggling to be heard, I wonder if that might not be a blessing in disguise. (Although I’m sure it’s still frustrating for female fetishists when they’re on the receiving end of certain assumptions, and I don’t mean to minimize that.) Here’s what I mean when I say it’s potentially a blessing. Society has a lot of negative labels for people with sexual proclivities that are considered undesirable. For instance, if I say the word “rapist” or “molester” or “pedophile,” people will immediately assume I’m talking about a man, not a woman. If I say “pervert,” people will assume I’m talking about a man. If I allude to someone being overly “enthusiastic” about anything sexual, people will assume I’m talking about a man unless I say otherwise. The word “fetishist” is kind of like the word “pervert”…it’s a label that generally thought of as something negative and undesirable. Again, if I say “fetishist,” people assume I’m talking about a man…it’s a word that describes “undesirable” sexual behavior, so the fact that people instinctively associate it with men is not surprising. It follows the same pattern as the other negative labels that have to do with sex. Sure, Quentin Tarantino’s foot fetish gets a lot of press and a lot of visibility, but at the cost of being the butt of a lot of jokes.
My point is that I think some people might shy away from recognizing women’s fetishes because they don’t like the idea of putting a traditionally male and traditionally negative or “gross” label on women. It seems like people are usually more reluctant to think of women as being “gross” or having gross attributes. A lot of them seem to be very attached to the idea that women are “sugar and spice and everything nice”–the idea that women are pure and innocent and not gross–and they don’t give up those ideas very easily. They don’t really want to believe that women are capable of “undesirable” behaviors in the same way men are. It ruins the sentimental illusion for them…kind of like going to Disney World and seeing the guy in the Mickey Mouse costume taking a break, smoking a cigarette with his giant cartoon head removed. An example: when you hear news stories about female middle school teachers sleeping with their male students, people are usually far more reluctant to call those teachers pedophiles, or to label it as an act of sexual assault, or to call the male students rape victims. If it were a male teacher with a female student, it would be a very different story.
Is it frustrating when people have these very common perceptions about women? Yes, it certainly can be, for a variety of reasons. But I think it could also be considered an unintentional compliment, depending on how you look at it. Personally, I’d rather have people give me the benefit of the doubt and be slow to jump to conclusions, instead of having them assume all sorts of negative things about me and label me a “deviant” if they ever suspect that I like feet, or if they suspect that I like tiny women. So for that reason, I’d call it a mixed blessing.
I say this a lot, but as always, I could be wrong.
-
apparently many guys have trouble seeing any part of themselves (except that one) as inherently desirable.
I guess that explains the much-lamented phenomenon of guys sending unsolicited dick pics to women (which I personally have never done).
When you think you’ve only got ONE good card in your hand, you lean on that one card pretty heavily. When you’re holding a hammer, everything looks like a nail… -
@protect-tinies I did some reading on that, apparently it’s the reaction they want. Positive or negative. But really I don’t know.
I’ve had women send me topless pics unsolicited. I’ve had guys send me dick picks unsolicited. One poor guy did it, and was shocked that I didn’t respond positively. He just misread the signs. I didn’t mind the miscommunication but he felt so bad he eventually stopped talking to me.
Why are you reading this and not messaging me?
-
@Deedee That’s true…I’ve heard about guys who act creepy or aggressive on purpose and who actually TRY to get a negative response from women, because they get turned on when women shame them for something sexual, act like they’re pathetic and disgusting, and so on. Similar to a femdom kink (there’s probably some overlap). I guess we’ll never know how many of those guys there are and how many of them are just tone-deaf.
-
@protect-tinies the worst part is I don’t mind that as a kink, I can get a bit assertive and if they played their cards better I’d have been happy to give them that kind of response and then some. I can give degrading as good as I love getting it.
Why are you reading this and not messaging me?
-
@Deedee What a GREAT/TERRIBLE response…depending on your preference at this particular moment.
-
@protect-tinies said:
My point is that I think some people might shy away from recognizing women’s fetishes because they don’t like the idea of putting a traditionally male and traditionally negative or “gross” label on women. It seems like people are usually more reluctant to think of women as being “gross” or having gross attributes.
I think the core of it is that people are so sex-averse that they view anything sexual or anything to do with sex/sexuality as “gross” or “disgusting” - which is so deeply problematic. As you’ve pointed out, it creates some pretty warped perceptions of what sex, and anything to do with what sexuality looks like. Personally, I don’t see it as a blessing to be incapable of being labelled as a “fetishist”, “kinkster” or whatever label you want to put in it, because it shouldn’t even be an issue in the first place. Perpetuating disparities creates misunderstandings and voids, and we’re all made worse off as a result - from as simple as the relative scarcity of female-friendly M/f content in size kinks, down to misconceptions of what/who constitutes a predator or problematic person generally.
@Olo thanks for sharing. I’d say that this sentiment is pretty well the same with so many other fetishes. There’s certainly parallels with size kinks! It’s a pretty ridiculous notion generally that women can’t have fetishes - then again, some people think that women don’t like sex, or that the female orgasm doesn’t exist. Then again again, maybe I’m just being hysterical
-
To be fair, the prevalence of male dick pics is, based on my understanding, more about getting a reaction at all, literally any acknowledgement, because we’re generally not viewed as attractive so we’re desperate for that kind of attention, in any form we can get it.
(Says the asexual who went through high school not even having sex on his radar, lol)
To be somewhat more on topic, while I dig a nice pair of high heels on a woman, for me feet are mostly a thing I either ping pong from vaguely acknowledging in general or really liking in size scenarios, as part of said scenario. It’s not that the high heel is hot, per say, so much as watching a tiny woman worship it out of fear or arousal, that symbol of female sexuality which is beyond her in every possible metric, with the cultural context of, ‘feet being dirty’ flavoring it as extra humiliating, hit on my dynamic fetishes just right; one of my longer lived fantasies, based on an pic I found a long time ago, is a tiny maid who polishes their Master’s (or Mistress’s) shoes using her own cum:
She climbs up onto the toe of the shoe (or strap, or what have you) humps it till she cums, then rubs her cum into the shoe, before moving up a little higher to repeat the process again, and again, and again… all while their owner looms over them, largely ignoring the woman crawling all over their foot.
