Why do you want to be shrunk?
-
@i-am-insane I’m glad you brought up Monster Fuckers. It’s an almost mainstream kink among women. I’m a monster fucker too.
My pet theory is that many women who feel a similar subby fantasy attraction that male giantess fans feel, bring that fantasy into monster fucking instead of human macrophilia, for whatever reason. (Maybe because they come across tall men a lot in real life so they find that not particularly exotic? And these tall men were shitty or just mediocre partners? Just spitballing).
I think that if someone made a site or a convention for both mf and macro, and it got popular, you might find a big overlap between macrophile men and monsterfucker women.
Unfortunately most of the people at this theoretical convention would be subs in search of doms, but that seems like a universal trait of kink communities.
-
So, I think you’re saying the main reason that more women aren’t macrophiliacs is, ultimatly, because… they aren’t imagining a giant man, and instead just picture a tall guy or something? Huh.
…There’s a story idea there, I think. Beyond that, not vampires, but I’m pretty sure a lot of werewolve style stories have big, looming guys, so there is that.
Power is choice.
-
Huh. That’s the second time someone’s linked shrinking with safety. I’m not sure what to think of that, but there’s definitely something there. And you want to explore things while small? Interesting.
-
@tiny-ivy said:
@i-am-insane Maybe because they come across tall men a lot in real life so they find that not particularly exotic? And these tall men were shitty or just mediocre partners? Just spitballing).
Spitballing just as much, perhaps they’ve mostly encountered tall men irl who don’t “deserve” their height, who fall short (heh) in other ways, say, by being conceited or taking their advantages for granted. Whereas monsters typically don’t take any affection for granted (they have other issues).
All my M/f stories and discussions can be found here.
-
@Olo
I’d think it’d be more the other way around, if anything: a lot of size stories I see with giants of any kind have them take them being big and better as a natural state of affairs; that the overwhelming arrogance and confidence seems to make it better. -
the overwhelming arrogance and confidence seems to make it better.
This may seem strange but I dig a giant with arrogance, confidence and smugness
-
@tiny-ivy That’s weird, I’ve seen a lot of tall guys irl and I became a macrophile.
Well I’m not a monster fucker either. So I don’t have said experience. I do think that there is a big overlap between macrophilia and monster fuckers in general. I have seen people who have made macro micro content also make monster people content. I guess giants could fall under the monster people category.
I guess I like giants better because I like tall guys and they are basically tall guys but on a whole another level.
Just chillin down here.
Also I only feel comfortable with being tiny.
https://bsky.app/profile/takoalice800.bsky.social -
Not quite.
Let’s assume cis-het on both fronts.My pet theory is that cis het men who have a fantasy about being dominated are more likely to imagine the dominator character as a human. Hence the very common giantess fetish.
But that cis het women with essentially the same type of fantasy are more likely to imagine the dominator character as non-human. Hence the pretty popular monster fucker fetish.
I don’t really have a great reason for why. The existence of actual tall men being common in women’s lives is just one idea for why.
Also I’m speaking in general. Of course there are actual cis het women macrophiles! And us trans folks who relate to that experience (hello!) and lots of other types of queer folks with all sorts of other experiences.
but in the wider sense. I’m just wondering aloud why M/f seems like the rarest macro pairing out there.
-
@TakoAlice8 Everyone is different, I don’t mean to invalidate your experience with my sweeping nonsense.
-
@tiny-ivy said in Why do you want to be shrunk?:
but in the wider sense. I’m just wondering aloud why M/f seems like the rarest macro pairing out there.
Oh, that’s easy: because it’s not only the closest to ‘real’, and so not really a fetish as much, the dynamic, of a man overpowering a woman, is becoming more and more frowned upon, societally. Even beyond admitting a flat out fetish, at this point I’d never want to admit this to anyone because, publicly at least, no one wants this. Popular media is set to churn out the opposite, if anything. And so anyone with it is incentivized to hide it.
-
@tiny-ivy Oh you didn’t invalidate me, that could be a possibility
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login