@SmolChlo a curse, what?! noooo, never! 
serisouly I’m impressed - I’ve shared a few of my tips and techniques with Miyoko91, and he made them even better. Personally I refrain from posting mediums like watercolour, charcoal or pencil AI gens since they can easily be mistaken for non-AI art. But he did tag them properly, and he’s done traditional works in the past so it’s all good in my book.
@Olo prompt engineering w/ ChatGPT requires weaving a lot of context to get the situation and emotions you want. You can’t say some word directly otherwise the watchdogs will be triggered. You need to balance the prompt to get a positive “mood”, and even then, sometimes the model can identify through the innuendo what you are alluding to.
(In this case I was trying to get her inside a cage, so the model’s inference that she was shrunk “against her will” probably stems from there)
Well is was a rather… eventful weekend over at OpenAI HQ, if you’ve seen the news/drama.
On my side, I did report some of my innocuous prompts as false positives to the powers that be. I didn’t receive anything else since then, but instead of the big bad email I’m getting those, which are friendlier I guess(?) :
No, ChatGPT, I don’t think I will. Oh well, I can work with that (and around that of course).
@Size_Master said in Recipe for Orange Cranberry Crumb Cake:
1 Cute Lilliputian girl (optional)
… optional!?! Hell no! 
@giantmaneddie the prosthetics team was led by Colin Penman, but I don’t know who has the rights to the penis, probably not them, but still worth a shot 
twitter.com / colinpenman67
LMAO, I love you guys… 
I never thought I’d get an in-depth discussion, analysis and even an installation guide on tinies toilets, and other related challenges.
@littlest-lily said in Audacity:
@Olo Ahhhh someone make this app stat
A G/t… dating app?! Ultra niche, but why I never thought of that!?! It doesn’t already exist, right…?
foreverlurks dropping his 19 other unfinished side projects to code Gullivr…
Just a quick observation from looking outside my window : snow! When there’s a foot or two of snow outside, navigating the outside world could prove REALLY troublesome, unless she has some serious ice climbing skills (and the makeshift gear, somehow?)
Although, now that I think about it, at such a light weight she could at probably walk on snow without sinking. I just don’t know how would she get her hands on shrunken winter clothing? Yeah, tinies are much safer inside the house, regardless of weather.
@Olo said in Lectured by AI about the morality of size difference:
@foreverlurk Yeah, unless OpenAI can provide a more explicit that you violated, you have an argument for a refund.
I’m thinking about it. They should be more explicit in their accusations, for sure. Maybe it’s not the size that’s the main problem, as I do have some mild nudity which technically is ALSO against their TOS.
Just for the record, I’m far from the only one who received such a warning, I’m on a few AI subreddits and oh boy… some people even got temp- and perma-bans.
@HHunter1 said in Lectured by AI about the morality of size difference:
Grumble Grumble Old man not like AI. Grumble
I don’t know if you mean I’M the old man in this case… ?! I’m not THAT old, haha 
@Olo said in Lectured by AI about the morality of size difference:
@foreverlurk Which of these programs charge a fee to use?
Midjourney has a subscription, which is why I’m waiting for the new version and will evaluate pros and cons before commiting.
OpenAI too, I did pay the subscription, but I’m reconsidering.
Stable Diffusion is 100% free.
@giantmaneddie I don’t know at this point, I’m already using Stable Diffusion a lot too. Waiting for MidJourney to release version 6 (they keep delaying it), and try sizey prompts. Otherwise I do have alt acounts but I’d rather keep everything I do above ground and by the book, if possible.
@Olo Now that I think about it, you may be right about the re-classification of size difference, as they are constantly adjusting the filters and being flooded with size requests must have triggered some manual(?) interventions recently.
And you also raise a very good point : I don’t know WHAT I did exactly against the TOS, there is no trace or proof, and I don’t know if this was an automatic process or a manual review of some kind.
Both possibilities are scary for different reasons.
@Nyx yeah and that didn’t come out of nowhere, they trained the AI to identify such content, and then to view it as “bad” and against their TOS and/or their own sense of morality.
I find it aggressive to receive this email and be treated like I’m generating hardcore shit. 
Have a look at the email I received this morning from OpenAI (creators of the DALL-E AI I’m using for some of my gens):
What!? I wonder what could have triggered that, like 95% of my stuff is so tame. I did get flagged for “putting persons in vulnerable positions or situations”, lol. Gee, that’s kinda how I roll, OpenAI. I’ll have to be more careful, I guess. I did argue with the AI (pointless, I know!) and got this reply:
WTF…
