Topics created by foreverlurk

This isn’t related to roleplaying or size stuff specifically, but I would disagree with the idea that cheating is the point when you romantically desire someone else more than your partner. The thing about desire is that it’s not really something we can consciously control. I think it’s very unrealistic to expect that you will never see or encounter anyone who seems more desirable to you than your partner in some way, especially considering that there are eight billion people on this planet. What are the odds that the person you chose to build a relationship with is going to always and indefinitely be the most desirable person in the world to you? Very, very low. Plus people change, and relationships change over time, so you can’t expect desire to remain absolutely constant. That’s why long-term relationships are based on commitment and not on desire alone. That’s why it used to be so hard to get a divorce: it was meant to deter married people from abandoning their commitments just because they were having a bad day or a bad year, or because they saw a hot person in a bar and became infatuated.

I think there’s a world of difference between desire and action. I might hate my boss, and I might desperately want to wring his neck, but does that make me a murderer or a violent person? No. I’m not guilty of violence unless I act upon my desires, or unless I start making a plan to hurt my boss and I intend to follow through on that plan. When desire turns into action or serious intention, that’s when the line has been crossed. It’s the same way with cheating or with other “crimes.” Desire alone does not equal guilt.

Desire is involuntary, but action is voluntary. Action is something you can control, but desire is generally outside of your control…that’s the key difference. Why am I harping on this? Partly because I don’t want anyone to beat themselves up for something they can’t control. I don’t want anyone to beat themselves up for having perfectly natural and understandable desires that every human has. But the other reason is that I don’t want to see anyone use desire as an excuse. If you believe that having certain desires automatically makes you guilty, then it’s easier to rationalize certain behaviors to yourself. You might think, “I’m already guilty of cheating, because I desire someone else more than my partner…therefore I might as well do what my desires tell me to do, since I’m guilty either way!”

@foreverlurk I saw that. B.J. (!) was the OG brat. I really wanted that skirt turned upside down.

@littlest-lily said:

But if someone is filling out a questionnaire that asks for a partner’s ideal height and then it went “but what if it was short term?”

Yes, I am curious about how the question(s) was posed/worded and how they’re interpreted by both responders and the researchers.

Here are the results from an Australian 2019 survey with over 1000 respondents (I’m guessing all male because it was on male beauty). Of those who responded with an opinion, most found 5’5-5’9" as attractive. But the question was “When thinking of beauty, which height do you consider ideal for women?” Which doesn’t mention or overtly suggest the dating or preferential aspect, i.e. you can find features attractive but you wouldn’t necessarily prefer or date a person with those features. Maybe it prefaces in the overarching survey, I don’t know. In saying that, I think it’s a relatively safe assumption to make for most, but can still make for fraught interpretations.

Sexy as fuck

Gorgeous, simply gorgeous all of them.

@skysayl I can’t say for sure, because I guess we don’t imagine the same things - where you imagine overwhelming full-body sensations, I focus on small, localised sensations on my body, mostly my hands, chest, and, well, privates. My hands are really good at getting those “phantom” sensations by pure imagination…

But having external stimulis never hurts! I found this stress ball squishy thingy, but in a different material than most, it’s NOT the jelly ones, I can’t explain but its texture is leathery/smooth and it doesn’t squish as much, like it offers some kind of resistance. If it was doll-sized and shaped, I would definitely use it to get the imagination going.

@foreverlurk Thanks, I sadly live in place that has banned big pets indoors and considered a hamster/guinea pig but I dunno if that is me.

I’ve walked the fine line of depression for most my life, I only admitted this kink for 2 of my GFs, both thought it was cute but sadly, one was a long distance and one moved away.

Right now, I’m exhausted, hating myself and just done with things.

@Visitor6996 No, because I haven’t done any size-related ones before. 😅 They’re a bit scattered because I don’t keep a social media page. One is posted to archive, there’s two or three I did for gonewildaudio (the account is deleted and I never reposted them,) I’ve got a WIP and one I haven’t gotten around to uploading. Then a bunch of scattered little recordings in discord for shits and giggles. I like to do funny impressions of annoying gremlin-like characters and bug my friends with them so they’re… all over my dms. 😵 I’m a mess.

All said, if I do record something sizey I will definitely share here!

@foreverlurk said:

I’d say most of my guilt is self-imposed, reinforced by those factors, and the occasional comments I’ve read.

No censor is so strict or vigilant as an internalized one. Trauma can be self-reinflicted years after the original cause has been removed.

@foreverlurk Ohh, but that is just as good for me ~

@foreverlurk I guess the only way is on her dA, I’ll keep her in mind next month.

@littlest-lily blushing intensifies. Thanks LL🥰

I’m amused that the company is named Shrunk.

HH1

@Olo prompt engineering w/ ChatGPT requires weaving a lot of context to get the situation and emotions you want. You can’t say some word directly otherwise the watchdogs will be triggered. You need to balance the prompt to get a positive “mood”, and even then, sometimes the model can identify through the innuendo what you are alluding to.

(In this case I was trying to get her inside a cage, so the model’s inference that she was shrunk “against her will” probably stems from there)

@tiny-ivy Thanks! “Tolerance for deviance” seems an excellent rule of thumb for identifying a WLW gaze. 👀

@jody said in There Are Worse Jobs:

There’s an Egyptian/Greek statue wing of the art museum in my hometown and this legitimately used to be my dream job (still is). So many stone hunks… all I needed was one night alone there, alarms deactivated. But alas 😢

Ah, life isn’t fair 😠

For all we know, miss Eleonora Pucci is “one of us” and is living the dream 😆

But seriously… that statue is 17 feet tall? I never thought.

@Olo oh I remember that episode, ah! Used to watch ST with my father back in the days.

You know when I think of it, tiny AR holograms or full VR with haptic feedback gloves might be the closest thing we’ll ever get to ‘real’ SW.

@foreverlurk There needs to be a SW episode of Hot Ones.