@Olo
I’d think it’d be more the other way around, if anything: a lot of size stories I see with giants of any kind have them take them being big and better as a natural state of affairs; that the overwhelming arrogance and confidence seems to make it better.

Best posts made by i am insane
-
RE: Why do you want to be shrunk?
-
RE: Pecs, chests and lots of...
When it comes to holding a woman, I prefer enough size that I can feel her, and I don’t have to worry about squashing her if I squeeze a little.
When it comes to a woman exploring me, however, I prefer that to be a bit more literal. Micro/macro, woman walking on a chest that isn’t just big, it’s enormous. Bigger than a house, bigger than a city, a living country in it’s own right.
I want to be so overwhelmingly more that I cease to be understandable and become an alien landscape.
-
RE: Question for fans
Honestly, I have to guess that a lot of size vore content is just… vore content, taking the most logical approach to eating a person: making them bite sized.
On vore? Because it’s very… primal. It’s predatory behavior, tying in well with how size fetish in general, and it’s a way to dominate someone and dehumanize them in a fundamental level, reducing them into food. When you eat someone, you take them, in their entirety, and you never will be separate again. Also, presumably, they’d taste good, and all that fun stuff involved in actual eating.
Mouth play has a lot of similar appeals, but non-lethal, obviously. It also allows you to combine pleasure and fear.
Insertion isn’t really my thing, but it’s probably similar to normal vore, but just… more of a focus on dicks and the sensation than eating.
-
RE: What are your thoughts on this
…Huh. I’m not exactly looking for these arguments, for obvious reasons, but when I do see it the logic isn’t, ‘A woman doing this is corrupting someone because her body is EEEEVILLLL’ or whatever, it’s ‘a woman exposing herself like this is degrading herself and/or is doing this for/because of men’.
Like, I don’t doubt there’s people who say that, but it’s just not a tact I’m used to seeing.
For the record, the idea that women’s bodies have to be covered and hidden is stupid, and following through that logic means that men are horny animals with no control and something should be done about that since clearly there’s no self control possible. Which… is also stupid, but strangely enough I’ve never seen that argument come up.