• Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    1. Home
    2. i am insane
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 6
    • Topics 35
    • Posts 336
    • Best 256
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 1

    Posts made by i am insane

    • RE: Cruel or gentle giants

      In anything close to realistic, I go gentle. I’m just… kind of unbearably soft, even if I still want to dominate and such. If it was an ownership scenario, I’d set up my pets in the best way possible, that I could still disassemble to allow access with little effort on my part, so really elaborate doll houses with a roof I can take off in a snap- and maybe without doors.

      Kink-wise is more based on my mood, really, but I like begging. I like it a lot more than I probably should. I like fear and cowering. I like destroying things, not because I want to, per say, but everything around me is so pathetic it can’t exist near me, all those things that are kind of the inevitable conclusion of actually being a giant, to the point city/state/country policy revolves around me.

      Vore is hot, but such a loss of product I probably wouldn’t do it even when I was cruel because, well, then I wouldn’t have the woman I just ate! Vore play, and threatening with it, with a bit of ‘will I or won’t I’ that even I’m not 100% sure about hits the spot.

      posted in Size Life Chat
      i am insane
      i am insane
    • RE: How Open Are You All About Your Fetish?

      Open? Not at all.

      Even ignoring that fetishes are fetishes, and so people don’t want to talk about them… this one just isn’t one that will be received well, I think, these days.

      Obviously there’s people who are into it, and there’s probably quite a few people who would be OK with it, but culturally all of this isn’t going looked at kindly.

      posted in Size Life Chat
      i am insane
      i am insane
    • RE: Does anyone feel this way about F/m

      Broadly, I’m really tired of F/m being the dominant size concept. Really tired. There has to be more of us but by god does no one want to admit it, I guess.

      More specifically, every time I try to dip my toes into F/m, it always seem to objectify the man, especially if it’s a broad shrinking thing. The women, meanwhile, are just casually living their lives.

      Full honesty here, I know it’s a personal thing on my part because I love it when these things are applied to women, but well. I don’t want it to apply to me. Beyond that, probably because of how my brain is wired, small, powerless, objectified, whatever- that’s hot. Vulnerability is hot. But men aren’t hot, not to me, so every time I see it part of my brain just disengages from the attraction of the concept, even if the big woman herself is hot, because it’s trying to apply a sexy concept to something unsexy, like trying to be attracted to a rock.

      shrug

      I know my kinks. I’m not terribly proud of them, but I know them. And beyond in a broad ‘the woman in this picture is really sexy’ kind of way, F/m is never going to be one of them.

      posted in Size Life Chat
      i am insane
      i am insane
    • RE: Unpopular Opinion/Hot Takes

      We need more giga/tera giants. There’s micro SW, but really, really, really big guys make it hard to do anything but smash things.

      posted in Size Fantasy Chat
      i am insane
      i am insane
    • RE: Feet in size content

      @blehb
      I mean, I get that much: feet are the lowest part of the body, the dirtiest. Stepping on something is a symbol of humiliation and conquest.

      It’s just something that seems very common, more than that could explain.

      posted in Size Fantasy Chat
      i am insane
      i am insane
    • Feet in size content

      Yeah… lately, especially, I’ve noticed that just. A lot of size content is focused on feet. And not even in a expected, ‘the feet are the closest part to the tiny’ way, but interactions with feet as a focus.

      What is everyone’s thoughts on this?

      posted in Size Fantasy Chat
      i am insane
      i am insane
    • RE: Critical role Lauren Bailey (fairy rouge)

      The giant dick she’s stuck against: You have chosen… poorly.

      The fairy trapped with it: internal and external screaming

      posted in Videos
      i am insane
      i am insane
    • RE: Mini-giants

      @Olo

      Yeah, but just over the normal possible size is just the start of the mini tier. I’ll see people twice the size of a normal person being called a mini-giantess, not just a weirdly tall person compared to a weirdly short one, trouble using normal things often deliberately included.

      It’s interesting to me because you can hit a sweet spot of having a lot of giant stuff, being able to break things, unstoppable, but still able to enjoy a lot of modern conveniences without breaking suspension of belief when it comes to clothes and such existing.

      posted in Size Life Chat
      i am insane
      i am insane
    • RE: Mini-giants

      @tiny-ivy
      I’ll admit, the main reason I thought of it is I’m rolling around an idea in that kind of vein as well (seventh son unwanted noble goes off to explore the world and has to come back when he’s the only child left for a political marriage, but he grows while he’s gone).

      But, oof. You had to hit on the big point like that, didn’t you? The sheer lack of M/f content compared to others hurts.

      posted in Size Life Chat
      i am insane
      i am insane
    • Mini-giants

      I’ve just realized that there’s not really a lot of mini-giants, like, at all. Either women are shrunk really small, or men end up really big; there’s never any just past human size men, or actually the height of a small child women (for anything that’s not part of a transition to a smaller size, anyways).

      And it’s kind of weird when I think about it? I don’t even look for it, but you see tons of it when you gender flip it. I don’t know, it just feels off to me and I don’t know why. I’m kind of wondering if this is part of the ‘women with monster-fucker fetish’ thing, where werewolves or whatever can reach that ‘big but can still fit in a building’ size.

      posted in Size Life Chat
      i am insane
      i am insane
    • RE: Militsioner

      @foreverlurk said in Militsioner:

      @Noneja I don’t know why all games are from the tinies perspective, we giants need games too! I would even settle for an observer mode.

      There’s that old game, Haku, I think? The set up is you were getting shrunken women (who came out of fruits) for unexplained reasons, but it turned out you were actually a giant who fought off kaiju and I think they were paying you with the women?

      It was an SW pet care simulator, but it would have been awesome if you could have beat up monsters and stomp over the city as well.

      …Also, if i ever could have played it.

      posted in Other Media
      i am insane
      i am insane
    • RE: Unwilling stuff

      I mean, that’s absolutely a fetish in a general sense. I might even say it’s common, even, considering what I know about female erotic stories and the like. I’ve found an almost certainly female author making stories about women cheerfully getting mind fucked into someone just as powerless to resist their owners as a shrunken women is, and a sort of shared universe literally called ‘Human Domestication Guide’, where the main characters are made into obedient pets by invading, well meaning aliens, so… yeah.

      If you’re into it, willing, and consenting, then it’s not ‘unwilling’ in the meaningful, rape-y sense, which is rather the point where that gets awkward, morally. Hell if it’s just a story or a fantasy, then there’s no one real at all to be concerned about, and RPs aren’t real (unless you’re actually shrinking? 😏 ) so even if a ‘giant’ ‘steps on you’ you’re not actually getting stepped on by a giant foot, so… what’s the harm?

      Honestly, I’ve always found it more concerning the other way around, since then you’re actually doing the wrong thing. The same logic applies there, of course, but I’ve always had problems emotionally accepting the logic about my own desires, so it’s not like I don’t get what you’re talking about.

      posted in Size Life Chat
      i am insane
      i am insane
    • RE: I wish there was a term for exclusively male giants

      @TakoAlice8 said in I wish there was a term for exclusively male giants:

      About using the word “giant” to exclusively refer to males of size. What would people use to describe people of size outside of the traditional gender binary? Xgiant or something like that?

      I mean, giant, in itself, is a gender neutral term, it just means ‘big’. It’d make more sense to pick a male exculsive term… problem is how the english language works. There’s not really a good thing for the niche of ‘neutral’ because ‘giant’ is neutral, and for a male version, what? Hisiant?

      I suppose you can just to ‘giant man’, but it feels awkward.

      posted in Size Life Chat
      i am insane
      i am insane
    • RE: I wish there was a term for exclusively male giants

      @DFP said in I wish there was a term for exclusively male giants:

      ? = tiny man
      ? = tiny woman

      I often see ‘miniguy’ and ‘minigirl’ when searching e-hentai and the like. I feel like those would work well. Honestly, I’ve always used ‘giant’ as a male only term to go with ‘giantess’, but I’ve seen giant used for women occasionally.

      posted in Size Life Chat
      i am insane
      i am insane
    • RE: What are your thoughts on this

      …Huh. I’m not exactly looking for these arguments, for obvious reasons, but when I do see it the logic isn’t, ‘A woman doing this is corrupting someone because her body is EEEEVILLLL’ or whatever, it’s ‘a woman exposing herself like this is degrading herself and/or is doing this for/because of men’.

      Like, I don’t doubt there’s people who say that, but it’s just not a tact I’m used to seeing.

      For the record, the idea that women’s bodies have to be covered and hidden is stupid, and following through that logic means that men are horny animals with no control and something should be done about that since clearly there’s no self control possible. Which… is also stupid, but strangely enough I’ve never seen that argument come up.

      posted in Size Fantasy Chat
      i am insane
      i am insane
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 22
    • 23
    • 1 / 23