Posts made by i am insane

I’ve just realized that there’s not really a lot of mini-giants, like, at all. Either women are shrunk really small, or men end up really big; there’s never any just past human size men, or actually the height of a small child women (for anything that’s not part of a transition to a smaller size, anyways).

And it’s kind of weird when I think about it? I don’t even look for it, but you see tons of it when you gender flip it. I don’t know, it just feels off to me and I don’t know why. I’m kind of wondering if this is part of the ‘women with monster-fucker fetish’ thing, where werewolves or whatever can reach that ‘big but can still fit in a building’ size.

@foreverlurk said in Militsioner:

@Noneja I don’t know why all games are from the tinies perspective, we giants need games too! I would even settle for an observer mode.

There’s that old game, Haku, I think? The set up is you were getting shrunken women (who came out of fruits) for unexplained reasons, but it turned out you were actually a giant who fought off kaiju and I think they were paying you with the women?

It was an SW pet care simulator, but it would have been awesome if you could have beat up monsters and stomp over the city as well.

…Also, if i ever could have played it.

I mean, that’s absolutely a fetish in a general sense. I might even say it’s common, even, considering what I know about female erotic stories and the like. I’ve found an almost certainly female author making stories about women cheerfully getting mind fucked into someone just as powerless to resist their owners as a shrunken women is, and a sort of shared universe literally called ‘Human Domestication Guide’, where the main characters are made into obedient pets by invading, well meaning aliens, so… yeah.

If you’re into it, willing, and consenting, then it’s not ‘unwilling’ in the meaningful, rape-y sense, which is rather the point where that gets awkward, morally. Hell if it’s just a story or a fantasy, then there’s no one real at all to be concerned about, and RPs aren’t real (unless you’re actually shrinking? ) so even if a ‘giant’ ‘steps on you’ you’re not actually getting stepped on by a giant foot, so… what’s the harm?

Honestly, I’ve always found it more concerning the other way around, since then you’re actually doing the wrong thing. The same logic applies there, of course, but I’ve always had problems emotionally accepting the logic about my own desires, so it’s not like I don’t get what you’re talking about.

@TakoAlice8 said in I wish there was a term for exclusively male giants:

About using the word “giant” to exclusively refer to males of size. What would people use to describe people of size outside of the traditional gender binary? Xgiant or something like that?

I mean, giant, in itself, is a gender neutral term, it just means ‘big’. It’d make more sense to pick a male exculsive term… problem is how the english language works. There’s not really a good thing for the niche of ‘neutral’ because ‘giant’ is neutral, and for a male version, what? Hisiant?

I suppose you can just to ‘giant man’, but it feels awkward.

@DFP said in I wish there was a term for exclusively male giants:

? = tiny man
? = tiny woman

I often see ‘miniguy’ and ‘minigirl’ when searching e-hentai and the like. I feel like those would work well. Honestly, I’ve always used ‘giant’ as a male only term to go with ‘giantess’, but I’ve seen giant used for women occasionally.

…Huh. I’m not exactly looking for these arguments, for obvious reasons, but when I do see it the logic isn’t, ‘A woman doing this is corrupting someone because her body is EEEEVILLLL’ or whatever, it’s ‘a woman exposing herself like this is degrading herself and/or is doing this for/because of men’.

Like, I don’t doubt there’s people who say that, but it’s just not a tact I’m used to seeing.

For the record, the idea that women’s bodies have to be covered and hidden is stupid, and following through that logic means that men are horny animals with no control and something should be done about that since clearly there’s no self control possible. Which… is also stupid, but strangely enough I’ve never seen that argument come up.

In part because of curiosity, and in part hope to inspire more conversation here… ladies, what do you want in a giant?

Do you want them to be cruel, deliberately so, to tease and torment you? Do you want them to be kind and spoil you, love and cherish you? Or do you want them to be… indifferent to you, maybe even ignorant of your very existence?

Part of me has this brainbug about even imagining myself as a crueler giant, but I’m pretty sure the audience for it exists.

Honestly, I have to guess that a lot of size vore content is just… vore content, taking the most logical approach to eating a person: making them bite sized.

On vore? Because it’s very… primal. It’s predatory behavior, tying in well with how size fetish in general, and it’s a way to dominate someone and dehumanize them in a fundamental level, reducing them into food. When you eat someone, you take them, in their entirety, and you never will be separate again. Also, presumably, they’d taste good, and all that fun stuff involved in actual eating.

Mouth play has a lot of similar appeals, but non-lethal, obviously. It also allows you to combine pleasure and fear.

Insertion isn’t really my thing, but it’s probably similar to normal vore, but just… more of a focus on dicks and the sensation than eating.

When it comes to holding a woman, I prefer enough size that I can feel her, and I don’t have to worry about squashing her if I squeeze a little.

When it comes to a woman exploring me, however, I prefer that to be a bit more literal. Micro/macro, woman walking on a chest that isn’t just big, it’s enormous. Bigger than a house, bigger than a city, a living country in it’s own right.

I want to be so overwhelmingly more that I cease to be understandable and become an alien landscape.

Looks like Little Nightmares reskinned as Grounded.

@tiny-ivy said in Why do you want to be shrunk?:

but in the wider sense. I’m just wondering aloud why M/f seems like the rarest macro pairing out there.

Oh, that’s easy: because it’s not only the closest to ‘real’, and so not really a fetish as much, the dynamic, of a man overpowering a woman, is becoming more and more frowned upon, societally. Even beyond admitting a flat out fetish, at this point I’d never want to admit this to anyone because, publicly at least, no one wants this. Popular media is set to churn out the opposite, if anything. And so anyone with it is incentivized to hide it.

@Olo
I’d think it’d be more the other way around, if anything: a lot of size stories I see with giants of any kind have them take them being big and better as a natural state of affairs; that the overwhelming arrogance and confidence seems to make it better.

@TakoAlice8

Huh. That’s the second time someone’s linked shrinking with safety. I’m not sure what to think of that, but there’s definitely something there. And you want to explore things while small? Interesting.

@tiny-ivy

So, I think you’re saying the main reason that more women aren’t macrophiliacs is, ultimatly, because… they aren’t imagining a giant man, and instead just picture a tall guy or something? Huh.

…There’s a story idea there, I think. Beyond that, not vampires, but I’m pretty sure a lot of werewolve style stories have big, looming guys, so there is that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ud8SlwXlByA

She’s made more than this, btw, and half the reason I’m posting this here is that this is, unironically, the only SW/GT ASMR I’ve ever seen, so I’m hoping to boost views and get more of them made.

GTS all over the place, of course.