Best posts made by miss-lillipants

@Olo very sad news

I’m a gentle content fan so will tend to prefer (what might be considered) more gentle methods with my maximum size being approximately 4 inches (or a ~1:20 ratio). But like some other responses here, the pick up and holding technique are dependent on the context. I have 3 preferences.

Generally, I like having the hand down and open for the tiny to crawl, step or hop into. This acknowledges some of the tiny’s independence and ability to make decisions, before being engulfed by a hand at least twice their height. The fingers can be curled slightly for some added protection and stability for the tiny, especially during the initial lift. Allows for air flow, some movement on the tiny’s part, quite a comfortable and flexible position for the giant: 10/10, preferred method.

In moments where time is fleeting, or the giant’s patience is wearing thin, a solid grab and fist around the tiny’s body may be more appropriate. For the tiny’s comfort, ideally their head, shoulders and arms are free, but this can’t always be guaranteed. The grip must be firm with the potential tighten (perhaps to teach a lesson, or as a result of rising tempers, maybe both). More of a symbolic gesture than a transport method, so excellent for proving a point of who is the big man, but grip tightness may be difficult to control (could also be triggering for claustrophobia): 7/10

Another symbolic gesture, but I think is better suited for playful or teasing situations, is the fingers and thumb pinching the torso and/or hips. Pinching pressure is much easier to control than a meaty fist, so force can be adjusted as appropriate. The tiny is exposed and their legs are free and left to dangle, kick, wriggle etc. but a firm hold and good placement of the fingertips can keep the tiny from wriggling out. To me, something about this method emphasises the size disparity and the diminutiveness of the tiny more than a fist - whilst the fist is a natural symbol of power, seeing someone held only by fingers seems more dehumanising as the tiny is reduced to a dangling exhibit. Better suited for short distance transport, but comfortable for lifting the tiny up to or above head height: 9/10

@nyx I remember this story! And still a great read. So many lines that are just thank you for posting

@Nyx aw thanks! I think CF has a little less of a reticent relationship with M/f content these days, but I don’t blame your hesitancy. In saying that, I’m pretty sure that’s where I’ve read the majority of your content! Heehee

To be honest, a part of me is a little surprised that there’s not much in the way of growth/literal giant in M/f content (at least, it seems like it). But I think that’s probably part of a larger conversation around perspective, pleasure and a partner’s pleasure.

@littlest-lily said in Out of their Element:

Like a worm.

An appropriate question to ask is: would he love you if you were a worm?

Thanks for posting this, @littlest-lily ! I’m very excited to see where it heads lovely, engaging writing. Just chef kiss

@Technomage I’m not picky as to how, when and whether “giant” is used literally. If I was, I would be missing out on some pretty awesome stories and cornering myself further into a fussy little hole. I think back to what someone said to me years ago, that “it’s all relative”. I do find it interesting though, and a bit ironic, that a lot of guys much prefer the role of human amongst tinies. I said earlier that I think there’s a larger conversation around perspective, pleasure and a partner’s pleasure - if anyone is keen to share their thoughts, I’d love to hear them.

@littlest-lily said in Out of their Element:

Along with today’s chapter I also wanted to give the head’s up that I’m having a medical procedure tomorrow. It shouldn’t cause any kind of hiatus (because that would be terrible timing with how things are going in the story), but if I end up going quiet for a few days then that’s why

Good luck and speedy recovery! ️

@Olo said in An appreciation for GIANTS:

When you mention “perspective, pleasure and a partner’s pleasure,” are you talking about role-playing, stories, images, or what? I know that in my stories I usually try to give some perspective into all parties to an encounter, which is (IMO) what makes it sexy.

I meant for any medium, really. I’m someone who also takes pleasure in knowing that my partner is taking pleasure in something - it’s an enormous turn-on for me. So, even thought I would more likely engage a tiny woman’s perspective, I won’t necessarily think about or have just a single character’s narrations, thoughts or feelings in mind; I’d be thinking about what would be pleasurable for the giant, what turns him on, how he’s feeling in that moment as he holds a finger-sized woman in his hand. So I appreciate content that does the same or similar!

@littlest-lily I can’t help but feel that this is the real calm before the storm…

I prefer around 1:20; between 3-4 inches for tinies, or 100-150ft for giants. I’m a gentle fan so, for me, this gives enough size discrepancy for a lot of interaction with enough leeway to turn a fluffy situation into an intimidating or fearful one.

Lately though, I’ve been appreciating larger ratios (e.g. around <1-2 inches for tinies, or 200-400ft for giants) if I’m itching for more destruction, domination and godliness.

Big men, big kisses, big feelings. The real holy trinity.

@Olo said:

As for handling F/m content, you’ll grow into it.

Haha

@i-am-insane said:

The other way is… well, don’t have the interaction at all. The guy is a little statue, or something: can’t move, can’t talk, but he can perceive the world around him, to some extent.

I’ve thought of this is a scenario too, and it tends to centre around themes of loneliness, feelings of inadequacy and trying to rebuild (physically, emotionally, etc.) after a major event. Giving him some sort of consciousness still makes me feel some obligation to expand on his perspective, especially if it also adds depth to their eventual relationship (call me a romantic). But I agree - it is a slightly better alternative to engaging with a tiny man character.

I’m not inherently against F/m and SM content. For me, it just comes with a lot of baggage. But if it makes sense to include or adds to the story (even better), then I can put a lot of that baggage aside. I think with this trope, I can then do away with it entirely once the first part ends

@littlest-lily said in Hypnotizing:

God, I feel so stupid right now, but I’m just too damn curious.

GIRL. College, dudes and curiosity makes for an unideal situation for cats!

@Olo said:

Being a giant is much more congenial in a world without artillery, aircraft, or nuclear weapons.

True. I like to spare my giants exposure to harder hitting pests, but they have a time and place.

I may or may not have giggled in excitement at these updates.

(I definitely did)