Question for fans
-
I’ve noticed there seems to be a strong interest in the size community for both vore and urethral insertions. If I’m wrong, please correct me, and also if you have such an interest would you be willing to share your reasons for either or both? I’m still on a learning curve and I’d like to learn about this as well as possibly adding those elements to videos if I can do it convincingly. I’m looking for input from both Giants with an interest in either as well as tinies with an interest in either. Being a Dom IRL I can faintly grasp the motivation for doing both to someone else, but I have the feeling it actually works against me when I try to imagine someone’s interest in being stuck into someone’s urethra or being eaten and I do really want to create believable characters if I add either of these elements to my work.
Thank you in advance for your assistance.
-
@DFP Because a giant forcing a helpless shrunken plaything inside his monumental manhood for his perverse pleasure is the ultimate form of domination. I guess it could be seen as a BDSM thing about huge power imbalance.
I wish there was more shrunken women cockvore content online.
-
@Jötunn Lotsa girls into cockvore on Bluesky. They’re so eager they won’t let me taste them first; they only have eyes for my pisshole.
-
Not a fan myself but I can understand the desire plus I’ve seen a lot who are into it
-
I’m more a mouthplay fan then vore, but I take what I can get. As for penial insertion, no interest here. But that’s just me.
HH1
HH1
-
@HHunter1 Too bad, I would have loved to read one of your stories with this theme
-
@Jötunn
Sorry, just not my thing.HH1
HH1
-
Short-medium answers:
I prefer mouthplay to vore. And to me, the appeal of mouthplay is its intimacy and the thrill of its precariousness. It is both threatening, but - as a fluff/romance fan - also an exercise in trust.
Whereas I’ve only relatively recently gotten into cockvore. And I’ve discovered that the the appeal there is the clear show of power, dominance and especially humiliation. The insertee can be a single person, a collective, a bus or train, or whole building - I don’t care, so long as they are miniscule in comparison to the giant. No tight squeezes; just drop, slide, disappear. Barely what you’d call a toy - more like fodder.
-
@HHunter1 All good
Eagerly waiting for one of your new stories in AO3, love your work -
@DFP I’m not into vore personally, but have a humiliation kink, so the thought of insertion of anything else degrading does it for me.
-
@Jötunn
Well, Thank you. I’ll try to add something soon. Just in a bit of a creative lull at the moment.HH1
-
Honestly, I have to guess that a lot of size vore content is just… vore content, taking the most logical approach to eating a person: making them bite sized.
On vore? Because it’s very… primal. It’s predatory behavior, tying in well with how size fetish in general, and it’s a way to dominate someone and dehumanize them in a fundamental level, reducing them into food. When you eat someone, you take them, in their entirety, and you never will be separate again. Also, presumably, they’d taste good, and all that fun stuff involved in actual eating.
Mouth play has a lot of similar appeals, but non-lethal, obviously. It also allows you to combine pleasure and fear.
Insertion isn’t really my thing, but it’s probably similar to normal vore, but just… more of a focus on dicks and the sensation than eating.
-
Thanks for the feedback everyone! Right after posting this I had a time crunch for a few days so I apologize for not replying sooner.
On the insertion thing, I have to assume most people have never had a catheter. Having something shoved into your urethra doesn’t seem Dominant to me. It hurts like hell! But to each their own and I was just looking at things that might be popular in videos. So thank you for the broad array of feedback!
-
@DFP said:
On the insertion thing, I have to assume most people have never had a catheter. Having something shoved into your urethra doesn’t seem Dominant to me.
I don’t have a penis, but I understand the pain and discomfort involved in shoving a rod in a hole that’s not meant to have something in it. But I would say the pleasure in insertion scenarios (of any kind, including vore I would say) isn’t necessarily from the physical sensation - at least not entirely. Pleasure and other feelings (e.g. powerful/lessness, humiliation, fear, anxiety) don’t always require something physical. It’s the experiencial narrative, the situation, and the awareness of it (as the person experiencing it or witnessing it).
For example: the insertee being so small that the the giant can’t even feel them. It’s not about how it physically feels then, because you can’t feel them at all, but some people love it for a range of reasons.
Another example: a dildo type of scenario. If I’m drawing parallels to the real world, statistically say, vaginal penetration is often not enough to cause an orgasm. Frankly, after a while of just penetration, it doesn’t really do much anyway in terms of pleasure. You have to compensate by stimulating something else. In the case of a GTS scenario using a person as a human dildo, the extra stimulation there is the use of a human being (or humanoid, whatever) as a sex toy and whatever feelings and pleasures that tends to elicit.
-
@miss-lillipants Thank you for that insight and it actually makes sense. As a formally trained Dom for 38 years now I’ve always said the largest sexual organ in anyone is actually between the ears. So, the mental aspect makes perfect sense. I can also appreciate the implication (although not actually said as I have no wish to put words in your mouth) that penile insertion might be more about the insertee’s pleasure at being so helpless.
Thank you for the fullness of your reply!
