Posts made by foreverlurk

Just a quick observation from looking outside my window : snow! When there’s a foot or two of snow outside, navigating the outside world could prove REALLY troublesome, unless she has some serious ice climbing skills (and the makeshift gear, somehow?)

Although, now that I think about it, at such a light weight she could at probably walk on snow without sinking. I just don’t know how would she get her hands on shrunken winter clothing? Yeah, tinies are much safer inside the house, regardless of weather.

@Olo said in Lectured by AI about the morality of size difference:

@foreverlurk Yeah, unless OpenAI can provide a more explicit that you violated, you have an argument for a refund.

I’m thinking about it. They should be more explicit in their accusations, for sure. Maybe it’s not the size that’s the main problem, as I do have some mild nudity which technically is ALSO against their TOS.

Just for the record, I’m far from the only one who received such a warning, I’m on a few AI subreddits and oh boy… some people even got temp- and perma-bans.

@HHunter1 said in Lectured by AI about the morality of size difference:

Grumble Grumble Old man not like AI. Grumble

I don’t know if you mean I’M the old man in this case… ?! I’m not THAT old, haha

@Olo said in Lectured by AI about the morality of size difference:

@foreverlurk Which of these programs charge a fee to use?

Midjourney has a subscription, which is why I’m waiting for the new version and will evaluate pros and cons before commiting.

OpenAI too, I did pay the subscription, but I’m reconsidering.

Stable Diffusion is 100% free.

@giantmaneddie I don’t know at this point, I’m already using Stable Diffusion a lot too. Waiting for MidJourney to release version 6 (they keep delaying it), and try sizey prompts. Otherwise I do have alt acounts but I’d rather keep everything I do above ground and by the book, if possible.

@Olo Now that I think about it, you may be right about the re-classification of size difference, as they are constantly adjusting the filters and being flooded with size requests must have triggered some manual(?) interventions recently.

And you also raise a very good point : I don’t know WHAT I did exactly against the TOS, there is no trace or proof, and I don’t know if this was an automatic process or a manual review of some kind.

Both possibilities are scary for different reasons.

@Nyx yeah and that didn’t come out of nowhere, they trained the AI to identify such content, and then to view it as “bad” and against their TOS and/or their own sense of morality.

I find it aggressive to receive this email and be treated like I’m generating hardcore shit.

Have a look at the email I received this morning from OpenAI (creators of the DALL-E AI I’m using for some of my gens):

What!? I wonder what could have triggered that, like 95% of my stuff is so tame. I did get flagged for “putting persons in vulnerable positions or situations”, lol. Gee, that’s kinda how I roll, OpenAI. I’ll have to be more careful, I guess. I did argue with the AI (pointless, I know!) and got this reply:

WTF…

Hello again, I’ve posted some more stuff on DA! As usual, some a lil’ spicy, some wholesome, some corny. Here’s a small sample of my latest generative AI artwork :

Starlust - Touch me with your light and I’ll burn like a star

Never leave your shrink rays unattended…

She is ah, overwhelmed, um, yup

Without my glasses you honestly looked like a mouse

Ducky Fun

Love the variety of expressions, perspectives (first-person FOV grabs/pinchs/handhelds are my ), angles, along with the visual storytelling.

@nephilim said in Looking for source of this GIF:

LOLOL. YOU MUST TELL US HOW THAT GOES

hehe I will, honestly it’s so wholesome even normies could like it. Mind you, I’m still navigating the idiosyncrasies of online dating after being 15+ years in a stable relationship… but yeah, hopefully this time around I won’t stay in the ‘size closet’ forever.

@SmolChlo I just love understanding what makes other people tick, too… even if it’s not my main fantasy. Simply keeping an open mind made me discover some aspects I hadn’t considered, and explore scenarios I had previously discarded!

@miss-lillipants said in zHEIGHTgeist:

I know that we, as fans, have enough insight to dismiss her comments (as you have), but perhaps it’s some consolation to see an informed observation coming from the outside.

It is, thanks for sharing this very interesting blog post. Love that quote “I was turned on
by ‘Gulliver’s Travels’ before I knew what the
birds and the bees were all about”. I know the focus is on macrophilia (again!) but it gives me some insights that helps my own journey of self-understanding.

I hope that microphilia will be explored later in the podcast, I know we’re a rarer breed but we do exist (or maybe we don’t, ask Dr Friedman!), and I’d still like some data about its origin beyond the usual “it’s-the-patriarchy!”, and hopefully beyond the purely sexual aspect too.

@littlest-lily oh, I’m sure you’ll “lovvvvve” her… she also believes that “no woman could possibly be attracted to giants, and that no woman could fantasize about being tiny”.

So basically you don’t exist!

Okay, that Dr. Helen Friedman really triggered me.

Suggesting psychological issues, abuse(!) and a sadistic mother!? I had a very happy childhood and a loving, caring mother. Then her take on the rules of “healthy sexuality”, like she’s the gatekeeper of it all. And yet, Helen, I was turned on by the idea of tiny girls WAYYY before I even knew what sex was… Me, at 9yo, wishing so bad a Borrower girl lived in my walls, not really understand why.

I’m convinced individuals like her (and the spread of similar ideas) contribute to the guilt many of us have experienced at some point. Their approach, steeped in religious and pseudo-Freudian concepts, seems heavily influenced by religious values and ideologies.

I still wish a real, scientific and peer-reviewed study was available on the subject.